And you are assuming that they will be "practice players" and self-admittedly, preferred walk-ons. Again, why not go to the source and ask the question?
Is it at all possible that this man, who has led a successful program for 29 years, might just see something that all these other people do not? Does it always have to be SO obvious to everyone else in order to make sense?
So, if "knowledgable" analysts are wrong half the time, where does that leave clem?
