Quote:

Just because a 6 or 7 seed makes the final does not require it to take the Premier League spot. Look at the 14 girls from SAA. Last year they made the finals as a lower seed and decided to enter the PL. They only scored one goal and gave up 65 during Premier League play. Looking back, should they have taken the PL spot? Will it be wise for both of the u13 boys and u14 girls finalists to take a PL spot?



I think Loc Dog may be onto something here (it is not often I can say that!) but he has a good point--maybe we as a state should probably ONLY send one team to Premier league play--in the fall we had FIVE of our "second" teams without a win in all of league play.

On the boys side--Cesa 90 Challenge 0-5-1 (2 goals for--20 goals against) and Bridge 92 Gold 0-9-0 (4 for--38 against) but in Bridge 92 defense their team lost some players to the Academy.

On the girls side--CUFC 90 0-11-0 (5 for--42 against); CESA Premier 91 0-10-1 (6 for--43 against); CESA Challenge 93 0-10-1 (4 for--49 against).

And now we are talking about sending a "third" team? Who are we kidding!