Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 19 20
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 49
M
kick off
Offline
kick off
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 49
With all thats been said about the seeding. Who is the best team left in the Boys U13 tourny? I know that all three areas of the state is represented.

Last edited by mustangs; 05/12/09 07:43 PM.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 190
F
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
F
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 190
So are you folks saying we should deny a team the opportunity to play premier because they may not win any games? How about the exposure this gives the kids and the opportunity to play against the best teams in the Region. Isn't their any value in exposing the #2 team in the state so they may improve their play?

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 190
F
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
F
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 190
Quote:

With all thats been said about the seeding. Who is the best team left in the Boys U13 tourny? I know that all three areas of the state is represented.




My predictions on the boys side for the finals.

U13 - CESA v. Lexington County
U14 - CESA v. MPSC

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 165
J
JAK Offline
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
J
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 165
Quote:

you are using the NFL as justification,but more sports use a normal tournament format.




Professional baseball, basketball and hockey reseed. College football playoffs (not BCS) reseed.

What are the "more sports" that determine the champion without reseeding. Not a tournament, but the actual league champion. You've named one (NCAA Divison 1A Basketball).

But to make it clear, in terms of determining a state champion, I think reseeding is irrelevant. You beat everyone you play and you are state champion. You don't beat everyone and you shouldn't be state champion.

However, I think for properly determining PL representatives of the state (and to best represent the state), reseeding is important to get the best two representatives. Every team still has an equal chance to earn a PL berth, but that equal chance is determined over the entire season, not just based on the initial seedings.

Last edited by JAK; 05/13/09 02:00 AM.
JAK #120295 05/13/09 04:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,521
C
hat-trick
Offline
hat-trick
C
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,521
Parker,
Did you miss the not all part? Thanks for doing the math..How many CESA teams had winning records? Since you have done the math

Last edited by coldhardtruth; 05/13/09 04:26 AM.
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 167
S
Goal Kick
Offline
Goal Kick
S
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 167
JAK,

The reality is that instead of reseeding, SC should go to a relegation/promotion system to avoid those "winless" teams. The EPL send their top 4 teams to the champions league. There is not tournament. My arguement is that if you are going to play a tournament, and you are the best team, you will beat everyone anyhow. Use the state cup tournament for Regionals not for RPI3. Use the challenge league standings for that. Then use rel/pro. Don't reseed in stated cup that way if "cinderella" wins they play at the regional finals but NOT RPi3.

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 90
R
throw in
Offline
throw in
R
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 90
CHT: I'm just Joe Friday giving you the facts.

The 14,16,17, and 18 boys had winning records. The 15 girls had a winning record. Not sure about the 18 girls.

Addendum #2: Spring 2009- Bridge 14 boys 1-10. SAA 14 girls 0-11.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,521
C
hat-trick
Offline
hat-trick
C
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,521
Hey Joe,
You left out the CESA 14 girls 2-7-2

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 90
R
throw in
Offline
throw in
R
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 90
That record was included in my first post. More detail: 16 girls 4-5-2. 17 girls 0-9-1.Not sure about the 18 girls. Believe those are correct. More familiar with the boys side.Boys 15 3-5-2 off the top of my head.

Hope that helps.

Last edited by Parker Lewis; 05/13/09 01:51 PM.
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,521
C
hat-trick
Offline
hat-trick
C
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,521
18 girls were 4-7

Page 4 of 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 19 20

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.066s Queries: 35 (0.023s) Memory: 3.2119 MB (Peak: 3.5905 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-06-01 23:52:18 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS