SC Soccer Forums SCSoccer.com Forums Club Soccer & ODP State Cup Results

CHT-Cesa had 1 team on the girls side that had a winning record in R3. On the boys side they had 3.
Parker-CESA B U-18 0-5-1

No wonder they called the TV show "Parker Lewis Can't Lose"

MPSC: Wrong. 14,16,17,18 boys had winning records. CHT gave me credit for my math skills and I count 4.

See addendum 1. I gave the records for both CESA challenge teams- boys and girls combined.They are called Challenge teams.

Give me a couple of minutes and I'll put sone more numbers forward.

You tell em..Joe!!

There are two CESA 18 boys..Premier 4-0-2 and challenge 0-5-1

Here you go...without hard data, this is just club cheerleading.

Winning Records
> CESA 90 Boys Premier 4-0-2
> CESA 91 Boys Premier 5-2-2
> CESA 92 Boys Premier 7-0-2
> CESA 94 Boys Premier 5-2-4
> CESA 93 Girls Premier 8-1-2
> Total - 29-5-12 63% WP (46 Matches)
> Goals For - 94
> Goals Against - 45
>
> CUFC 91 Boys 7-1-1
> Total - 7-1-1 .78% WP (9 Matches)
> Goals For - 24
> Goals Against - 20
>
> DSC 90 Boys 4-1-1
> Total - 4-1-1 .67% WP (6 Matches)
> Goals For - 16
> Goals Against - 5
>
> Losing Records
> CESA 90 Girls Premier 4-7-0
> CESA 91 Girls Premier 0-10-1
> CESA 92 Girls Premier 4-5-2
> CESA 94 Girls Premier 2-7-2
> CESA 93 Boys Premier 3-5-1
> Total - 13-34-6 .25% WP (53 Matches)
> Goals For - 42
> Goals Against - 105
>
> CUFC 93 Boys Elite 1-7-1
> CUFC 90 Girls Elite 0-11-0
> CUFC 91 Girls Elite 3-8-0
> CUFC 93 Girls Elite 1-9-1
> Total - 5-35-2 / .12% WP (42 Matches)
> Goals For - 39
> Goals Against - 138
>
> Bridge 92 Boys Gold 0-9-0
> Bridge 93 Girls Gold 1-9-1
> Bridge 94 Boys Gold 1-10-0
> Total - 2-28-1 / .06% WP (31 Matches)
> Goals For - 20
> Goals Against - 101
>
> SAA 94 Girls 0-10-0
> Total - 0-10-0 / 0% WP (10 Matches)
> Goals For - 1
> Goals Against - 65
>

My mistake....just used to looking at the bottom for the CESA team Didn't see that they had other team in there.

Bottoms up to you MPSC...

Combined Stats for "The Big Three" as so many like to refer to them as:

CESA Premier Teams: 42-39-18 / WP .42% (99 Matches)
GF: 136 GA: 150
CUFC Elite Teams: 12-36-3 / WP .29% (51 Matches)
GF: 63 GA: 158
Bridge FA Gold Teams: 2-28-1 / WP .06% (33 Matches)
GF: 20 GA: 101

Now, could I have used CESA Challenge teams’ records in this data? Sure. But, that wouldn’t be apples to apples now would it. Not nearly the same as one of these clubs taking their second teams to the award podium for Classic Cup medals.

I am sure some will try and qualify this information a certain way and some will twist this to fit whatever preconceived notions that they have. For me, I would just like to know how anyone could get “The Big Three” out of this information? Suely they are referring to registration numbers. It can’t be fields owned. They can’t be looking at State Cup history or College Signing success. They can’t be looking at head to head results. What they are doing is following one team from the club and calling that team their club. Do other clubs have one or two quality teams? Yes, no question. But, it is ridiculous to throw the club name out there when a large majority of the club can’t get to the finals on a consistent basis, can’t get their top teams in to Premier League, haven’t won head to head on a more consistent basis.

The facts are there. If folks don’t want to see it, then that is a different problem.

Parker,
Why do you feel the need to defend the most successful club in SC? I can't find where anyone has attacked them..It must be frustrating to be a part of such a successful club and yet you feel the need to put your thumb on others..I think most know what the facts are..Sit back..breathe and enjoy the situation your child is in..