Some clubs develop and some clubs just take.
CESA does a great job of developing players and have built solid teams. Understandably players from other areas are then drawn to those teams making them stronger.
Bridge on the other hand has taken from the local clubs without prior involvement in those players development and have had a negative impact on the clubs they have taken from, creating a lack of trust. Yeah, they have created opportunities to a few players but most of them were better off where they were.
MPSC has obviously done an amazing job of developing players as players are recruited constantly from them; with parents being sold on the grass is greener, when reality is the majority are better off staying with MP.
