SC Soccer Forums SCSoccer.com Forums Girls Varsity Soccer 22-1

Very good post coach chass. Funny thing is Pinewood got hammered against Wando 7-1, that is a 29 goal differential which is just staggering to me. If I am Pinewood prep I would schedule more quality teams like Wando to avoid getting beat in a 7-1 pounding.

I'm a panther fan and I just wanted to let everyone know that the game against Wando, Pinewood had the JV keeper in who never played in a competitive game before. Pinewood has played competitive schools this season including Eastside and Woodruff and beat both teams, they are also playing Academic Magnet, Bishop England, and the were suppose to play Summerville but they backed out.

And to talk about the 22-1 score Pinewood can't help who's in their region. What would you rather them to do? Pass the ball around and have them chase or play actual soccer like they suppose to do. Pinewood has played players down before and put their second string in during other games.

As a side note Pinewood never posted the score in the newspaper nor on the score thread.

True they can't help their region, but why put in 22 after a 17 point win over them earlier?? You know going in that's a win; get to 10 and call it off.

Do private schools have any influence relative to selection or application to the league in which they play? I notice Christ Church, St. Joseph's, Bishop England, Southside Christian and others play SCSHL A/AA rather than SCISA. Of course there's no guarantee that a team with the current roster strength of Pinewood wouldn't find themselves with an opportunity to run it up, but maybe the opportunities would be fewer and not quite as grand. At least it would give the teams like Northwood Academy, who finds themselves on the short end of an aggregate 2 game score of 39-1, a bit of a break and Pinewood greater opportunity to have to work for that many goals. Then again, staying SCISA is a great route to state championships and setting individual scoring records. Is there some regulation that keeps them in SCISA?

Private schools pay to be a member of SCISA. They can be a member of any league they choose. The schools you mention above choose to play in the SCHSL.

As far as beating someone 22-1 in soccer goes it is just crazy. I guess sportsmanship is not part of the soccer experience at this particular school.

Did the game get physical in the 2nd half? I'd imagine it would be hard for players to keep their composure when the score gets that out of hand, especially when it was the 2nd time it happened.

Glad to see Wando rout them so they saw how it feels.

17-0, 17-1, 22-1.

No excuse for these type of scores. 8-0 should be the max.

My advice, next time someone can- BOMB THEM!!!

*sigh*

These threads are ridiculously annoying.

22-1 is extremely proficient in the scoring department. Games of this significant difference should be called at half. 10-0 at half is insurmountable. Just end it there and let everyone go home instead of watching 40 more minutes of embarrassment to the game.

So, PPrep can't choose the teams in its region, but it can choose the league it plays in. And, 2010 goal differential against SCISA schools... 110 for vs. 8 against, and against SCSHSL schools... 6 for vs. 11 against. 2011 goal differential at this point against SCISA schools... 80 for vs. 6 against, and against SCSHSL schools... 9 for vs. 11 against. Almost looks like that scoring proficiency disappears, when they step out of SCISA. Maybe Sideline Observer's "JV keeper in who never played in a competitive game" asterisk on the Wando score should be accompanied with a "against SCISA schools" asterisk on any individual stat sheets.

Given Wando's 6-0 win last year and 7-1 win this year, maybe the more appropriate asterisk applied should be "with a 6 goal lead Wando backed off the weaker team" allowing the little team from down the road to save some face.