Forgive me. If it's not THAT serious, how serious is it? If it's not serious, why should anyone respond to criticism of it?
Me? I have no problem with ANY such list, as long as its authors have actually seen the kids play, or will readily admit that they HAVEN'T seen all of them, or even MOST of them, this season.
Multiple LIVE or VIDEO observations is the only relevant credential in rating players. "List By Reputation" or "List By Statistics" is irrelevant.
Earlier this season, I commented that one inclusion on the weekly boys' list wasn't among the top handful of players ON HIS TEAM, much less statewide. I assume the girls' list has the same value.
All in good fun, eh?
