Very good question. The reason I suggested 16 and not 32 is to try and limit travel cost as much as possible.
Quote:
Quote:
What an open seeding system does is allow the conversation of who deserves what seeding and makes an attempt to pair things equitably. If this is such a horrible idea then why does the NCAA and high school football do it that way?
So, if equitable pairings for a playoff system leading to a state championship is the goal, why stop at 1-16? Why not 1-32? Personally, I would settle for a re-seeding of the final four at the semifinal stage.
