>>[Beezer] 1) Are we moving toward achieving more regional finalists and champions faster than the other states or are we falling further and further behind?
Response: Very slowly forward but with a limit. Individual clubs are doing great, like CESA and in time Bridge FA. However, they need competition from the entire state not just every fourth match every two weeks. Even Premier League is 10-12 matches, over months, which in the development picture isn't enough.<<
Very difficult to disagree with your point here...it seems spot on.
My only comment would be that what I'm beginning to see is that at least at CESA there's enough "critical mass" so that most teams can get really good scrimmage-level competition from other teams within the club -- with the exception probably being at the oldest boys age brackets. And what I'm seeing are the formation of informal inter-state club alliances that lead to more scrimmaging among more top teams in the region.
However, "more better" soccer in SC is absolutely needed.
>>2) What I saw yesterday before I left Little Rock was a SC team that played the #1 ranked nationally ranked team.
Response: Soccer is soccer. A SC will play well here and there against the best. We need day in and day out teams and, more importantly, players competing like this.<<
Again, agreed...great point.
>>3) On the other hand, I read your post and wonder what your agenda must be to disregard the improvement that SC appears to be making.
Response: By no means am I disregarding SC soccer, I live here, coach here, recognize attempts (like CESA, Bridge) and want to help as much as anyone get kids the opportunities some kids are getting in top states/regions.<<
Absolutely understood...
>>4) So, taking your "argument" at face value -- and I agree with your premise that SC wasn't good enough in June to be in the national pool and has never been with only a few incredibly rare exceptions -- what is your prescription for improving the performance of SC in future "June's"?
Response: My prescription is to have 1) a committee of top soccer coaches (club, college) to 2) appoint a full-time DOC and then 3) serve as his technical group and work closely in making all soccer/development decisions like league formation, training environments/curriculum and, of course ODP restructuring.
In addition, I believe the ODP pools, in this state, should be year round teams that play under a club (or maybe a SCYSA-formed Columbia club just for that matter) and play Premier League and/or US Club. Does the mean seperating and catering to the elite? YES. Decisions for the majority doesn't develop the minority, the best! You can still have SCYSA leagues for the other clubs/teams and they'll only play one another in State Cup. If the elite teams win, then it should (CESA is now almost doing that). If the elite teams don't win then things are advancing maybe. But this way the best players are guaranteed to play and train together with top coaches.
The most important thing is the top players train, at least, 3 times a week in Columbia (central location) and move around on weekends when there's not matches. With so few top, top players, they need to be in the same environment constantly.
I know this all seems drastic and different, and there's probably a better chance of seeing SCYSA brass (like Mary Bynum) juggling 3 times, but it's needed. Get rid of administrators making soccer decisions and allow that to the best soccer people. South Carolina needs thorough and wholesale change!<<
I will say that while I don't have the expertise to critique this...what I really like is that it recognizes that change is needed for SC to offer its best players more opportunities and services.
Looking at the SCYSA board minutes for the last few months, it appears that they are looking at spending a great deal of money to build facilities in the Columbia area. As someone that lives in this area, that sounds great to me -- although I do wonder what all of the paying members of the SCYSA not in the Columbia area think. In any case, perhaps SC only has enough money to offer a single centralized training facility for ODP (unlike Georgia, in which there are distributed training centers run by the state.) That's a problem for drawing in economically disadvantaged kids -- but any change to try to do better would be welcome. What I hope is that the SCYSA can get in and enact better services for its members as quickly as possible.
