Climacool...A definition of shots-on-goal would be required to validate anyones's numbers.
Technically Lexington scored 4 goals.
The first one was dissallowed (from a throw-in) because the referee did not see 1- the keeper touching the ball and 2-the ball brushing against the defender on the way in.
The second goal was disallowed because the referee blew the whistle AFTER the free kick was taken. The kick was a 25 yd shot to the far upper 90. The ref nullified the goal because the wall was not 10 yds away EVEN though noone from Lexington asked for the 10.
Of course if it was Wando it would have been a "lucky once in a lifetime thing"
As far as the numbers, you can say what you like but credit should be given to the South Aiken defense for again working the hearts out and preventing clean shots. It worked to their advantage the first meeting and kept the score low in the second.