Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 51
L
throw in
Offline
throw in
L
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 51
So what do people think the out come will be? From what I have heard Lex has a great chance. They should also do very well in Play-Offs

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 101
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 101
Quote:

With the shot count at 26-1, SA keeper must have played extremely well. He is a very solid goalie from what I have seen this year. He keeps them in a lot of games.





actually no...most of the shots were off target although he did have a pretty amazing save off a header, but other than that he didnt do much


Im tired of chasin my dreams Im just goin to ask 'em where theyre goin and hook up with 'em later
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
World Cup
Offline
World Cup
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
Quote:

lex completely dominated, the shot count was 26-1. If they coul have finished better the game would have been a blowout.




But the keeper didn't do much? Kinda hard to believe, no?

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 101
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 101
like i said most of the shots were off target and didnt even trouble the keeper


Im tired of chasin my dreams Im just goin to ask 'em where theyre goin and hook up with 'em later
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
bench
Offline
bench
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
all lexington has to do is win 2 out of the next 3 games to win region

Last edited by Rubix; 04/18/07 01:24 AM.

28 seconds
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,457
F
Hat-Trick
Offline
Hat-Trick
F
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,457
Climacool...A definition of shots-on-goal would be required to validate anyones's numbers.

Technically Lexington scored 4 goals.

The first one was dissallowed (from a throw-in) because the referee did not see 1- the keeper touching the ball and 2-the ball brushing against the defender on the way in.

The second goal was disallowed because the referee blew the whistle AFTER the free kick was taken. The kick was a 25 yd shot to the far upper 90. The ref nullified the goal because the wall was not 10 yds away EVEN though noone from Lexington asked for the 10.

Of course if it was Wando it would have been a "lucky once in a lifetime thing"

As far as the numbers, you can say what you like but credit should be given to the South Aiken defense for again working the hearts out and preventing clean shots. It worked to their advantage the first meeting and kept the score low in the second.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 91
throw in
Offline
throw in
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 91
who hit the free kick?

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,457
F
Hat-Trick
Offline
Hat-Trick
F
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,457
Same player that got "lucky" in the Wando game

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 91
throw in
Offline
throw in
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 91
Chavarria again huh? Hes so dangerous on the free kicks...what a talent!

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 64
throw in
Offline
throw in
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 64
He's got an amazing shot when he's got control over it. Congrats to Chavarria even though the goal didn't go down on paper, everyone that was there saw it.


Nobody asks to be a hero, it just sometimes turns out that way.
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.055s Queries: 34 (0.015s) Memory: 3.2023 MB (Peak: 3.5889 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-06-16 18:18:15 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS