beezer,the only reason i quote you is so i can remember what questions i want to answer.im not just picking on you but you raise some good questions.
as far as the large numbers go i do not have much of a problem with taking many players at a younger age.when my oldest first started i wasnt to crazy about it but if you only took one team the first year these kids can play odp then you may not have enough when they get older.some kids will not come back because of not making it and some just will not come back.the numbers always drop off over time.
as far as the A and B teams go it is not pleaseant either way.you may not make one good team and it hurts some but if you have a good player on a bad team they may get noticed more.remember that odp really is not about team anyway.i have seen them lined up in order by last name and the teams were split just like at practice.they went down the line pointing fingers (ABABABABAB)that is how the two teams were picked.im going to be on the other side on the money issue.i think we do not pay enough.like the old saying is,you get what you pay for.we have college coaches and as far as i know they get no money except maybe for room and board.when they have a practice it is on their own time.at holdover camp in bama two years ago i sat and talked to the mary bynum of texas.you would not believe what coaches are being paid and what parents are paying for odp in texas.they actually have a league these girls play in to try and move up to the A team.i promise you they pay alot more than we do.we pay for transportation,room and board.maybe that is one of the reasons we in sc are a little far behind.
the last thing is mary bynum.i really do not know her but i know she runs a tight ship.i think i am 100 % accurate that mary has no say in who makes a team.if you act up or cause trouble at camp she will send you home.four years ago when mine started she had never stayed overnight anywhere except with realitives.we were really not sure about the overnight stay.after one time with mary i knew i had nothing to worry about.her main concern was the kids.besides,she laid down the law and they were not going to do anything wrong.
as far as politics,well it starts past the sc team.when they look at keeping players sc is not their first option.
sorry for all the spelling errors.
Quote:
This is my final post on this topic but PLEASE don't put words in my mouth. I never said administrators select the actual rosters....they do not.
A broad example is team structures but call it what you may. Something like keeping multiple teams for a Sub-Regional event. Ridiculous, in a state like South Carolina.
If the teams are divided to be even, better players suffer not playing with other better players. If divided into A and B teams (better and worse), then why even have a B team? Just bring the top five bubble players on B team to training and give them until Regional Camp selection to prove themselves but don't keep a whole team's worth.
That's a type of personnel decision that 1) effects the better players not showing as well having to play with poor players and getting hammered at the event 2) gives the B team players no chance and 3) is a money maker...more kids going, more kids having to pay. Not needed!
Read the posts again and don't read into them.