|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
World Cup
|
World Cup
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768 |
Quote:
50/50 ball. No foul.
Agreed. Foot on ball before keeper.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 418
goal
|
|
goal
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 418 |
No foul. Good goal by BE.
You may disagree, but you're wrong!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 127
goal kick
|
|
goal kick
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 127 |
Quote:
Quote:
50/50 ball. No foul.
Agreed. Foot on ball before keeper.
Agreed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 855
brace
|
|
brace
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 855 |
Quote:
50/50 ball. No foul.
It was only 50/50 if you admit that that offensive player was going to hit the goile no matter what happened, her failure to pull up was dangerous to the keeper as she was going to run her through weather she caught it or not and that is dangerous.
Basic Definition of dangerous play (the part in quotes is right from 08-09 FIFA rule book):
Any action by a player that is unsafe to him or another player, in the judgment of the referee. When contact is made, the referee will consider whether it was "careless, reckless or there was excessive force".
In fact after watching the video several time I would say the keep was in position and ready to capture the ball when the offensive player iniated contact with her. There was no way the striker was going to get the shot without slaming into keeper. That is what makes it reckless! I can understand the no call by the refs as they do not want to "impact" the game but this one is a no brainer. IF the play was at other end of field I am sure the other team would feel cheated too.
Last edited by The Chief; 05/21/09 02:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 322
corner kick
|
|
corner kick
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 322 |
Since the Refs deal with these things in realtime with no replays or different camera angles. I believe they handled the call the best they could. I believe Waccamaw still had time on the clock to get the equalizer but just couldn't put it away. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 213
corner kick
|
|
corner kick
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 213 |
Well explained Chief! So many miss that rule (Refs and Coaches). It Does Not matter that she touched the ball first.
It applies in the field, but even more so to the keepers (she was in a vulnerable position and should have been protected).
It's sad, but the officials rarely enforce that rule along with the infringement rule.
"The rules never change....Only the interpretation"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,509
hat-trick
|
|
hat-trick
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,509 |
Quote:
Basic Definition of dangerous play (the part in quotes is right from 08-09 FIFA rule book):
Any action by a player that is unsafe to him or another player, in the judgment of the referee. When contact is made, the referee will consider whether it was "careless, reckless or there was excessive force".
Remember that the FIFA Laws of the Game do not apply to high school games.
The wording in the NFHS Soccer Rules Book is as follows:
"A player shall not participate in dangerous play, which is an act an official considers likely to cause injury to self or another player (opponent or teammate)."
Same idea, just worded differently. No mention of contact in the NFHS rules though.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
World Cup
|
|
World Cup
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768 |
9 to 4 saying no foul currently
Coach P, thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,509
hat-trick
|
|
hat-trick
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,509 |
Can't view the video for some reason.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,509
hat-trick
|
|
hat-trick
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,509 |
Quote:
...It's sad, but the officials rarely enforce that rule along with the infringement rule...
Spartan: Just curious, what are you referring to as "the infringement rule"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
