Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8
M
ManU Offline OP
bench
OP Offline
bench
M
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8
Will someone please tell me the process of ranking teams!! I thought that the end of the year rankings would be determined by the performance of the teams at the END OF THE YEAR! Therefore the teams who made a long playoff run should be rewarded with a high ranking... also wouldnt it make sinse to rank a team higher than a team they beat in playoffs?

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 202
B
corner kick
Offline
corner kick
B
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 202
Quote:

Therefore the teams who made a long playoff run should be rewarded with a high ranking... also wouldnt it make sinse to rank a team higher than a team they beat in playoffs?




I think it should be based on overall performance for the year - not just who made a long playoff run. A team could end up with an easy bracket in the playoffs or upsets could occur that would allow some teams going deeper than they maybe would have. It should also look at wins and loses and take into account who did a team lose to - a lose to Eastside; J.L. Mann; South Aiken or Chapin should be weighed differently than a lose to a lower ranked or unranked team. Same thing for wins - did a team have the upset or did you simply beat who you should have beat. I guess my only questions may be Bluffton with a 17-1 record and they finish the year 14th and Socastee at 15-5 and they barely crack the top 10. Those two seem like they may have been based on a one game season ending performance not a season's worth of work.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8
M
ManU Offline OP
bench
OP Offline
bench
M
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8
Yes I believe that over-all performance should be included. Eventhough Bluffton did have 17 wins their schedule was very easy, I agree with you that Socastee should be higher. BC should be higher than NMB and because Airport beat BC at The Cage in the 3rd round of the play-offs 2-0 then Airport should be higher than both of them. The top four placements are good but from there on it is questionable.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 630
Goal
Offline
Goal
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 630
Yes I believe that over-all performance should be included.

FWIW, NMB actually tied BC at 0-0. PKs were the difference. BC beat Airport 2 out of 3 times and 5-4 on aggregate. The balance of power is still in the upstate.


Victory Starts Here!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,418
World Cup
Offline
World Cup
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,418
Listed below are the criteria used for ranking Class 3A Boys - this method is used for every classification. I did not include teams 1-3 or 13-15 as those seem pretty straight forward to all.

#4 CHAPIN (4-1-0, 80.0%, 12 GF, 5 GA, +111, 247-136-8)
3-0 A.C. Flora
1-0 vs. North Myrtle Beach
2-1 @ Airport
5-2 @ A.C. Flora
1-2 Eastside

#5 NORTH MYRTLE BEACH (3-1-2, 66.7%, 7 GF, 3 GA, +43, 187-144-7)
3-0 @ Myrtle Beach
0-1 vs. Chapin
0-0 @ Socastee
2-1 Socastee
2-1 Myrtle Beach
0-0 Brookland-Cayce

#6 RIVERSIDE (1-4-1, 25.0%, 7 GF, 16 GA, +78, 215-137-10)
1-2 vs. J.L. Mann
2-1 Greenville
2-2 J.L. Mann
1-5 vs. Eastside
0-1 vs. Eastside
1-5 J.L. Mann

#7 BROOKLAND-CAYCE (3-3-1, 50.0%, 7 GF, 7 GA, +108, 268-160-9)
1-0 A.C. Flora
0-1 @ South Aiken
3-1 Airport
1-2 South Aiken
2-1 @ Airport
0-0 @ North Myrtle Beach
0-2 Airport

#8 AIRPORT (2-5-2, 33.3%, 12 GF, 17 GA, +38, 190-152-7)
2-2 A.C. Flora
1-2 South Aiken
1-3 @ Brookland-Cayce
1-2 Chapin
3-3 @ South Aiken
1-2 Brookland-Cayce
1-0 @ Hilton Head Island
2-0 @ Brookland-Cayce
0-3 @ South Aiken

#9 SOCASTEE (2-2-1, 50.0%, 5 GF, 5 GA, +25, 123-98-1)
2-1 Myrtle Beach
0-0 North Myrtle Beach
2-0 @ Myrtle Beach
1-2 @ North Myrtle Beach
0-2 @ South Aiken

#10 DANIEL (1-4-0, 25.0%, 8 GF, 13 GA, +31, 153-122-4)
1-2 @ Greenville
2-4 @ J.L. Mann
1-3 @ J.L. Mann
4-2 A.C. Flora
0-2 J.L. Mann

#11 A.C. FLORA (1-4-1, 25.0%, 7 GF, 15 GA, +38, 177-139-8)
0-1 @ Brookland-Cayce
2-2 @ Airport
0-3 @ Chapin
2-5 Chapin
1-0 Greenville
2-4 @ Daniel

#12 GREENVILLE (1-7-0, 12.5%, 6 GF, 15 GA, +61, 192-131-2)
1-4 vs. Eastside
1-2 @ Riverside
2-1 Daniel
0-2 @ Eastside
1-2 @ J.L. Mann
0-1 Eastside
1-2 J.L. Mann
0-1 @ A.C. Flora

NON-SC TEAMS
22-2-2 Farragut (TN)
18-6-1 Bob Jones (AL)
14-2-0 Norman North (OK)
12-5-2 Knox West (TN)
? Mowat Collegiate (CAN)
? Saltfleet (CAN)
? Wexford Collegiate (CAN)

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 36
L
kick off
Offline
kick off
L
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 36
weak argument. Last year, Airport's girls beat BC girls both times in the regular season and lost to them in the 3rd round of the playoffs. In the end, BC was ranked higher on the final rankings. Shouldn't it be the same for the boys?

These are just inconsistencies. Like telling a referee, "you don't have to be good, just be consistent."

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8
M
ManU Offline OP
bench
OP Offline
bench
M
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 8
Yes the upstate holds the top 3 out of 4 ranks in the state, however lowerstate holds the champion. As far as overall rankings there are 7 upperstate teams and 8 lowerstate teams, not to mention that Chapin has been a lowerstate team the past few years. However I will say that if South Aiken was still in 4A and Chapin was still in the lowerstate then Chapin would have made it to the state finals to face Eastside.

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 478
Goal
Offline
Goal
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 478
Who is on the committee for ranking???

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 36
L
kick off
Offline
kick off
L
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 36
give you one guess...

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 62
throw in
Offline
throw in
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 62
Stats don't lie


Yeah!! HAHA
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.120s Queries: 34 (0.068s) Memory: 3.2076 MB (Peak: 3.5867 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-05 16:06:20 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS