Register Log In

SC Soccer Forums SCSoccer.com Forums Boys Varsity Soccer 2009 Boys Massey Ratings Released

Print Thread

2009 Boys Massey Ratings Released #124581 06/14/09 02:44 PM
Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 6,688 Likes: 5 Cayce Kevin Heise OP World Cup
OP Kevin Heise World Cup Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 6,688 Likes: 5 Cayce	Thanks to Kenneth Massey for once again compiling the 2009 SC Boys Massey Ratings. 2009 Massey Ratings (SC Boys)

Re: 2009 Boys Massey Ratings Released Kevin Heise #124582 06/14/09 04:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,429 Fort Mill B Big Daddy hat-trick
Big Daddy hat-trick B Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,429 Fort Mill	Uh, Indian Land rated 20 spots higher than Clover or Nation Ford? Both of whom comfortably defeated IL?

Re: 2009 Boys Massey Ratings Released Kevin Heise #124583 06/15/09 09:02 PM
Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 98 S soccertennis throw in
soccertennis throw in S Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 98	How would Wahalla which Emerald beat 3 times and Wahalla who beat Batesburg Leesville be rated in front of Emerald. I can't see how that would be possible. When you look at strength of schedule both Emerald and Wahalla played alot harder schedules than Batesburg. For three consecutive years Emerald has made it to state finals but lost to Bishop England who would beat anybody in 2A 99% of the time. So how do you rate other 2A teams ahead of Emerald. That makes no sense!!! Also Emerald played Eastside who is rated 3rd and only lost 2-0 at Eastside.I'm not sure the Massey system makes much sense if you have teams you have beat all year ranked ahead of you and you make it to state finals every year. Not very accurate!!!

Re: 2009 Boys Massey Ratings Released Big Daddy #124584 06/19/09 09:55 PM
Joined: May 2009 Posts: 9 I ilwarrior bench
ilwarrior bench I Joined: May 2009 Posts: 9	Quote: Uh, Indian Land rated 20 spots higher than Clover or Nation Ford? Both of whom comfortably defeated IL? Actually, those 2 losses were scrimmages- in which IL was at less than full strength, missing 1/2 the starters. Also, IL beat Clover 3-2 in the regular season- in which they took a "comfortable" 2-0 lead into halftime.

Re: 2009 Boys Massey Ratings Released Big Daddy #124585 06/20/09 03:59 AM
Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 855 Fort Mill The Chief brace
The Chief brace Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 855 Fort Mill	Quote: Uh, Indian Land rated 20 spots higher than Clover or Nation Ford? Both of whom comfortably defeated IL? Well as Mr. Twain would say "There are lies, dam* lies, and statistics". These numbers seem to work ok for the obvious #1 or 2 but after that well it gets fuzzy? Look at FMHS behind Cardnial Newman??? They beat them handily during the season (not a scrimage!) yet FMHS ranks below CN??? They even beat Wando yet still ranked much lower? FMHS had 3rd hardest schedule, and 3rd ranked D (do not forget they played NWHS 3 time imagine where other team D's would be if they got to face the juggernaut three times) I could go on but in the end these number are meaningless and are only an interpetation of the results. They may do a good job of ranking the more narrow areas; schedule, O, D, but when you combine the easily quantifiable and try to rank things that are more subjective well thats where the problems start. Last edited by The Chief; 06/20/09 04:01 AM.

Re: 2009 Boys Massey Ratings Released soccertennis #124586 01/15/10 02:33 AM
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 101 Greenwood SC G GHS Eagles goal kick
GHS Eagles goal kick G Joined: May 2008 Posts: 101 Greenwood SC	How could Emerald be ranked 55 and Greenwood ranked 79 with Greenwood winning against Emerald in their last faceoff?

Moderated by Dave Easley, Kevin Heise, Kyle Heise

Link Copied to Clipboard

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)

Responsive Width:

PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.042s Queries: 26 (0.013s) Memory: 3.1228 MB (Peak: 3.5878 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-19 23:24:06 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS