Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,198
C
Brace
Offline
Brace
C
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,198
old gal , as you stated you are "a long time Senior Women's Administrator" How can you as a professional state that winning and losing should determine pay? Really ? So your schools failure rate should determine how much each teacher is paid, regardless of education level, time commitment and the work ethic and type of students in the classroom? Your pay should only increase if your schools meet No Child left behind standards each year and show improvement? So if you AYP drops or does not improve your pay should drop too?

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,062
B
brace
Offline
brace
B
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,062
A couple of realities here:
1) Football rules the roost at most SC high schools.
2) To keep (overpay) football coaches, many schools routinely allowed them to double-dip as ADs. My question is: If FB coaches are putting in so many hours, how can they effectively serve all students and sports, in both genders, as ADs? Answer: They generally can't, and often don't.
3) I have been "inside" one Class AAAA athletics program where the FB coach/AD, also listed as an "Instructor", instructs exactly nothing. (But makes high $90s.)
4) Regarding WAHS, the boys' basketball and volleyball teams (among others) have been prominent statewide on and off for years. To state otherwise is ignorant.
5) The FB/soccer time comparison is irrelevant. Yes, top FB coaches give a bunch of time IN SEASON. So do top soccer coaches, by the way. But the "club" crack is ridiculous. Why do you think so many soccer coaches also work for clubs? Because it's one way to identify and develop high school players. Which is to say, there is no true off-season in soccer. Unlike FB, where many coaches collect ADDITIONAL stipends for mindlessly babysitting their schools' jayvee basketball teams, while volunteers do the real teaching and coaching.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,198
C
Brace
Offline
Brace
C
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,198
Backscreen , I have not idea what your experiences are, I don't want to get on her an argue back and forth with you or the rest of the world. All I can tell you is that football is year round just like all sports. They have weight training, spring practice , and passing league runs all summer, as well as running the weight room thru out the entire summer.

Soccer coaches are not doing this, they send there kids off to play club, and some even work camps to make money. I don't know any that are running the weight room 5 days a week and have games every week.
So again unless you are actually coaching football or basketball or wrestling etc is hard for me to give your response credibility.
Are there things that could be better, absolutely. But that could be said for all sports and programs. We have a lot of good people who work hard at their chosen sport. I just wanted to shed some light on what football coaches are doing. That is all nothing more.
Regards,
Coach J

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,062
B
brace
Offline
brace
B
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,062
Coach: To me, this isn't about football vs. soccer, or any sport. It's about allocation of increasingly scarce funds to wildly overpay coaches. I appreciate as much as anyone the commitment it takes to teach and coach. I have seen the effort SOME coaches across all sports (in addition to those poor, overworked FB coaches) put into their position. And I commend them.
But the idea that you have a handful of "head" coaches making over $100k a year to drive their own personal Gators and be shadow ADs, nominal instructors, and coaches is laughable. Surrounding them with gigantic (paid) staffs compounds the felony. The idea that many of those assistants "teach" make-work classes and pass out grades like candy is incomprehensible. And defending that expenditure of money is intellectually bankrupt.
One final thought. I know a lot of people in various professions FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN FOOTBALL COACHING, who routinely work 60-70-hour weeks, year-round, for substantially less money.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
J
Brace
Offline
Brace
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
Quote:

Hatch, How many hours do you think a soccer coach spends at the school on Saturday and Sunday game planning for the next week? How many hours watching film, breaking down the previous game and then breaking down the 3 to 5 films of the team you are getting ready to play? How many script cards does he have to make, call sheets, and adjustments. I coach both and I promise you I don't have to spend as much tiume to get ready for the next game. Heck the only film I watch is my team. Soccer coaches dont trade game film. Most of the soccer coaches in the state coach club and HS at the same time, cant do that if you are working 70 hours a week. 4a football is a big time commitment, you work all the time. I only see my family on Sunday Morning and Saturday afternoon. I dont come home on Thursday or Friday until late and then up and gone with the sun on Saturday. Now before you try to bash my commitment to soccer , I promise I work just as hard , but soccer simply does not require as much time due to the nature of the game.




Lets see, where to begin. First, soccer coaches do trade film on other teams, and the good coaches in the state sit down, watch them and come up with a game plan from the film and the assistants that went to a game or two on their own.

Second, a head coach is a head coach. Here in Illinois, at least in school districts where I live, the head football coach does not make any more than a head coach of a team with a similiar length season. Why? Because they don't deserve any more than another head coach.

Third, do you really think that football is going to be around as it is today with all of the concussion issues they are having? I think not...the IHSA is passing some very stringent requirements that is going to have some large impacts on football as a whole. You also have a ton of parents that are not too inclined to let their children play a sport that has repeated head injuries that could cause massive problems later in life.

I get so sick and tired of football coaches thinking they are the end all be all of sports. We should use education systems to do what they were meant to do years ago and do away with sports associated with school. This is where the community should set up community sports programs if they are that important. Don't waste my tax dollars on programs that don't do squat for the betterment of society.


If you are going to argue a point, at least get factual information to back up your side.....
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,198
C
Brace
Offline
Brace
C
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,198
James you live out of state so your experience does not translate well to SC. Question in IL do Football coaches get fired and lose there job if they have a few losing seasons? How many people come to watch a HS football game in IL? How many Football coaches does you school have on staff? Football will not end but I think you will see club football in the near future. But we were talking about salary's. I was just shedding some light on how we are paid as teachers and coaches. When the amount of money and the difference in pay was brought up I simply again shared my experience.

Now I have been teaching for 21 years, have 21 years coaching, I get 60k a year to coach soccer , right? I mean I am the head coach and I make that amount , so by the news paper standard I am making 60k to coach soccer. Let's call the news and report that.


Don't expect a call back though, soccer is not going to sell papers, but football in the south sure does.

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,062
B
brace
Offline
brace
B
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,062
Coach, AGAIN you miss important points. Many FB coach/ADs in our state -- across enrollments -- DON'T teach. And many of them are nothing more than nominal ADs to supplement their salaries. (Thankfully, that is slowly changing, as more schools are separating the two positions IN RECOGNITION OF the problem.)
Your point about attendance, selling newspapers, generating revenue, etc., is relevant, as far as it goes. But isn't it amazing how so many of those football-crazy states lag behind their peers nationwide in public school student-body academic performance?
The 6-figure salary of a FB coach/AD at a mediocre academic institution is a legitimate concern for anyone who pays taxes.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,198
C
Brace
Offline
Brace
C
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,198
BS17, I stated I would like to see all AD's positions move to administrative with no coaching at all Beaufort county has done this as well as Cane bay.

Now would you feel the same way if the Track coach or Basketball coach ETC were the AD,or does it just bother you that it is the football coach? Wando's AD does not coach or teach and has a Administrative Asst. Is that a problem? He receives a teaching salary but does not coach.

Next question,how do you feel about the teacher who gets and extra planning period each day, about 1 hour and 30 min extra free time , and they are not a coach.
What for, yearbook, teacher cadet, department head, etc

IF I am AD and head coach, How much non teaching time should I get?
How many sports does a 4A high school have and how much administrative work is required for each sport?

I am asking these questions just to play the other side, You seem very bothered by this.


Also what other teaching/coaching job can you get fired from for losing games,or losing too many games?

As long as my teams behave and I run a good program , wins and losses will not get me fired as head coach, but I can keep my teaching job regardless.

Head FB coach does not have that same job security. Not only do they lose coaching job but also lose teaching job as well.

Is that ok with you?

I would love to see this discussion moved to the 4a football board on Palmetofootballtalk and see what would be said there.

I just find this a very interesting discussion on a soccer board. So I am have fun talking about.


If we want everyone to be treated the same then that means the coaches of other sports should be fired for losing as well.

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 2
C
Coach
Online Content
Coach
C
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 2
Quote:

If we want everyone to be treated the same then that means the coaches of other sports should be fired for losing as well.




Devil's advocate--you know it's one of my favorite games.

You COULD make the following argument:

Football is unquestionably the top revenue-producing sport at the majority of high schools, as well as being the "flagship" sport in the public view of the community. Football games potentially have the highest attendance rate of any high school sport, and therefore have the potential to keep the greatest number of community members connected to and invested in the school. Football revenue not only can be used to support the other sports within the athletic department, but it can also be used to enhance the facilities, appearance, capital improvements, and overall environment of the school.

Since it is apparent that attendance (generating revenue) and image (generating community support) are in a large part dependent on a program's success or failure, it stands to reason that a sport with far-reaching effects of its success or failure has a greater need to win, for the greater good of the school, while another sport whose record has much less impact on the overall success of the school is under much less pressure to win, because the CONSEQUENCES of losing are more bearable.

So, while idealistically we would certainly like to have everyone treated the same, from a practical, realistic point of view, the sports whose success have the greatest impact on the overall good should, by necessity, be held to a higher standard of success in terms of the wins and losses that in turn produce (or fail to produce) the desired and needed benefits of the program.


I've got good news and bad news...
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,062
B
brace
Offline
brace
B
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,062
Coach: A couple of points here. 1) I absolutely WOULD feel the same way about other dual coach/AD slots, if the point of the sham was to inflate the coach's salary by giving him a job/title he/she doesn't REALLY do. 2) As far as I know, the "Wando AD" is still an assistant FB coach. He stepped back from the head FB coaching job for a number of reasons, some (but not all) of which he explained to me. 3) If a coach is a legitimate teacher, he/she may be relieved of coaching duties but retain a teaching slot. It happens all the time. 4) I'm of the opinion that ALL teachers should have at least 1 "planning" block, whether they are working an extracurricular gig or not. That MANY teachers are wildly overworked implies the need for better, more equitable allocation of resources, don't you think? Hence, the original discussion. 5) The concept of "revenue" sports and their coaches somehow justifying higher salaries may work at the college level, where TV revenue, sponsorship, and alumni giving cover a lot of the costs, but not in the public school environment. And by the way, it doesn't work particularly well at the vast majority of colleges/universities, where athletics is a money-loser, but the tail STILL wags the dog.

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Kevin Heise, Kyle Heise 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.043s Queries: 34 (0.012s) Memory: 3.2131 MB (Peak: 3.5867 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-20 06:00:51 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS