Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 14 15
#29142 05/12/05 01:25 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
This is gonna be a great championship game. Any predictions? my guess is SA 3-2 second overtime. They dominated NW after the first 10 min.

#29143 05/12/05 01:51 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 149
W
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
W
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 149
SA 2-1 over Irmo, i don't think either team is goin to score 3 or more goals should be very close

#29144 05/12/05 02:08 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
SA by 2

#29145 05/12/05 03:23 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
i think Jamal will pull out the victory for South Aiken...i just dont think irmo can stop him...score: 3-1 South Aiken

#29146 05/12/05 03:35 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
See my earlier post.
Irmo by XX points. They don't/won't lose at this point.

MC

#29147 05/12/05 01:25 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
It is really hard for me to say that Irmo is gonna lose but, South Aiken is playing really good soccer and is gonna be very hard for anyone to beat. Personaly i would like to see South Aiken play against Eastside.

#29148 05/12/05 01:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
J
Brace
Offline
Brace
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
Irmo already beat eastside, so if they beat SA, they will be the best team in the state!

#29149 05/12/05 02:02 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,427
coach
Offline
coach
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,427
soccerboy,
Irmo beat Eastside early in season, when the best Eastside players were at Score at Shore.
The SA-Irmo game will be a war - 2 good keeps, 2 good scorers, 2 good defenses, it will all come down to the midfields. SA may be stronger in mid.
If Irmo cannot handle Jamal SA 3 Irmo 2
If Irmo can handle Jamal Irmo 2 SA 1.

#29150 05/12/05 03:24 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 398
L
corner kick
Offline
corner kick
L
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 398
Yeah Soccerboy,

Eastside was missing at least 6 starters earlier this year. They are definitely much stronger with those players. good luck to all the teams playing this weekend. The 4A game should be a very good game. If Jamal comes to play like he has since the playoffs started, I think SA will win.

#29151 05/12/05 06:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
goal
Offline
goal
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
Has anyone here done a comparison of State Championship opponents' records and rankings vs. who ends up winning the final match, i.e., does the record/ranking of the teams going into the state championship match reflect the outcome?

#29152 05/12/05 08:17 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
The good thing about S. Aiken is they have more then one player that can score at any time. Yes Jamal is without a doubt a high level player however S. Aiken has a hand full of players who have at least five goals. Ian Q. Joey S, Rob S, Craig G, Steven R, Branson H, even Jordan Q off the bench has a number of goals. Everyone has tried to stop Jamal all year some teams have and some teams have not but all but one team lost in the attempt. (Actually 2 SA did have a tie this year as well) The problem isn't stopping Jamal from scoring its stopping S.Aiken from Scoring. Commit to many players to Jamal and you will get burned by a number of other players don’t commit enough to stopping Jamal and he will burn you. The other side to the SA coin is Goose. THE BEST GK TO EVER COME OUT OF SC. Period... Lets not start blowing the A Moody horn. Moody is a good keeper and a smart player but no Mike G.

Phil Savitz is a proven expert at having his teams prepared for this game. The record speaks for itself. He has a very good team and has managed to win the big one with less talent then what he has this yr. SA beat them 2-1 earlier this season, which would be an advantage for Irmo. I would love to know if any team has ever-beat Irmo twice in one year. My guess is that it doesn't happen very often. Can SA be that team? We will find out. Good luck to both teams.

It will be a war! Can't wait to see who wins.

#29153 05/12/05 08:19 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
irmo will win 3-2. jamal will have 2.

#29154 05/12/05 08:25 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Irmo loss to Sa.. but with a redcard early in the first half and jamal cramping throughout the game it should be a true match- each team playing for it all.

#29155 05/12/05 08:38 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
This game will be played at the "Grave Yard", correct?

#29156 05/12/05 08:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
J
Brace
Offline
Brace
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
yes, correct

#29157 05/12/05 10:54 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
hey ghostman, let's not forget about Ryan Rimando off that bench. He did show flashes of brilliance at the NW game. The kid has a great attitude from playing with him in the past, and i cant wait to see him at his best.

#29158 05/12/05 11:53 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
No doubt, Ryan played extremely well against NW and has done a great job all year. Didn't mean to leave him out along with the Smith boys, Bret D. TJ and the rest of the TEAM. Congrats to Coach Waters and his staff for leading the T-Breds to the finals.

#29159 05/13/05 01:44 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
i dont know much about SA...but i do know about Irmo, and i cant imagine anyone in the state having a better midfield, Irmo has sonny (however you spell it), christian monroe, and spencer lewis in the middle, itll be hard for SA to match up with that, but once again i dont know SA's formation or who else they got besides geathers and the goalie.

#29160 05/13/05 02:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 35
kick off
Offline
kick off
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 35
im gonna say SA over Irmo 3-2 in OT

#29161 05/13/05 02:45 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Depends on if Coach Waters picks the starting line up out of his hat like he has done all year long. Seems to work for him.

#29162 05/13/05 02:51 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
hey dude you need to chill out on our coach. ya'll always say crap about him that he doesn't deserve. he is darn good, just look at his record while he has been here. yeah we have alot of talent but talent doesn't get you anywhere w/o good coaching. i'm probably going to get in trouble for posting this but i'm sick and tired of people raggin on him and saying that he is a terrible coach. lay off

#29163 05/13/05 02:55 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
SA chill. It was a joke. I know Paul and in fact am a good friend of his. Someone wrote this crap at the beginning of the year. I am just making fun of that being said earlier by someone who does not know Paul. But good to see your loyalty to Paul. Good Luck SAT

#29164 05/13/05 03:12 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
sagk1 is steve francis not goose

#29165 05/13/05 03:46 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Irmo's midfield is excellent. Christian Monroe is an excellent player and doesn't get the credit he deserves. Spencer is excellent and will be playing with Goose and Jamal next year for the Cock's. Sony is a baller. Played for a National Championship as the starting attacking center midfielder for the fire. Now plays for the New State Champions CESA. I would give Irmo's midfield the edge over everyone's. SA midfield is not as strong however what they lack in ability (And its not a huge gap) they make up with strength, speed, and hustle. I would say that SA would be very competitive vs. Irmo in the midfield.

#29166 05/13/05 04:31 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Irmo 2- SA 0
Irmo is cleary the best team in the state hands down...and nobody can beat them right now...

#29167 05/13/05 11:23 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Anybody is beatable anyday of the week. I think it will be a great game and a close game.

#29168 05/13/05 01:17 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Least you forget ghostwriter18... several of the SA boys were also on that team. Mr. Hyatt and Mr. Gulick, I believe will take care of business. Hyatt hasn't been given any credit whatsoever. He'll be leavin' it at the field come this Saturday. Jamal on the other hand is only a junior and will be returning next year. The defense of SA will rock and the great walls of Irmo will come tumbling down.


green is not looking very well on most of you....

#29169 05/13/05 02:52 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I don't really agree with everything ghostwrite said about Irmo's mid.

For one, Soni is given too much credit for what he does. Yeah, he is a presence in the middle, but good god is he slow. He got beat almost everytime in the DF game and made a lot of unforced erros in passing.

Spencer is solid, but easy to push around. He does have some of the best free kicks in the state though. Same with Monroe.

Clayton on the left is fast a good with the ball at his feet.

And darn Jeff's throw.

As for Zack, just score on him once and you'll ruin his game.

#29170 05/13/05 03:19 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
kiddinu402
Registered Member
Member # 1729

Rate Member posted May 12, 2005 11:12 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sagk1 is steve francis not goose


Isn't "Steve Francis" a basketball player...lol I think it's Craig Francis so yeah.

#29171 05/13/05 05:42 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I haven't seen South Aiken. I'm a DF fan. I tell you what. Is hard to beat Irmo.

I played againts them. They're Irmo man. Savitz is the deal.

Prinze is good. That number 3 controlls the game. Monroe, and Moody are good too.

I don't have a favorite but since I live in Irmo, I expect Irmo to represent our town just like they always do.

South Aiken needs more than one player to win this game. Good luck to both teams.

#29172 05/13/05 05:49 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,305
hat-trick
Offline
hat-trick
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,305
SA probably has 2 of the best players in all of south carolina, maybe some of the best ever. But as a team, Irmo is excellent, and there is no one that tops them. Sani (the correct spelling) christian, spencer, and whoever else plays in the middle with them do make up the best midfield i've seen in a while, and every other aspect of their team is excellent. I think that Irmo takes this one 3-2 with Prince scoring 2, and jamal scoring 2.

#29173 05/13/05 05:51 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,305
hat-trick
Offline
hat-trick
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,305
Then again, it will be tough for even prince to score against goose, and if the tight end plays up top again for irmo, they will be in trouble. (he is the only player that hasn't lived up to IRMO expectations in any game that i have seen)

#29174 05/13/05 06:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 187
E
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
E
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 187
Does anyone have any opinion on the effect of playing on a wider field than one or both teams may be accustomed to playing on? Do you think it will be to the advantage or disadvantage of one team or the other?

#29175 05/13/05 06:40 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Advantage for Irmo. They use the whole field. Their system is perfect to play in long fields. Irmo is just the best High School soccer I've ever seen. What a great program. What a great coach!

#29176 05/13/05 07:32 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
litte biased there fenomeno?

#29177 05/13/05 07:54 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
SA is loaded from the front to the back...they are gonna make Irmo work hard to stay in the game Sat!

#29178 05/13/05 08:11 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,305
hat-trick
Offline
hat-trick
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,305
Agreed soccerdfner16. South Aiken is good all around. But I think that Irmo is "more" loaded.

#29179 05/13/05 08:25 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
J
Brace
Offline
Brace
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
I think Fenomeno is a DF supporter, he was against Irmo in the last game!

#29180 05/13/05 08:42 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I honestly don't see how Irmo is that "loaded." I'm just hearing a lot of hatred toward South Aiken. Northwestern was supposedly "loaded" and South Aiken dominated after the Arroyo goal. I say SA 3-1 Irmo

#29181 05/14/05 12:53 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 398
L
corner kick
Offline
corner kick
L
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 398
While I agree that SA will when this game, your reasoning is alittle off base. NW was not loaded. They overachieved this year like they have in years past. I took a look at their website the other day and noticed only 3 seniors listed. When you look at their stats, none of the seniors registered any stats really. Next year, they bring back everyone, but one starter and could be considered loaded then.

Irmo however is loaded. They have two players who have already committed to USC. Monroe will definitely play somewhere. Not sure where Sani is headed, but it will probably be quality. Plus they have 12 or more seniors on their roster. So it appears that they are loaded.

#29182 05/14/05 01:33 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
J
world cup
Offline
world cup
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
SA wins.. or the tides of darkness return!

#29183 05/14/05 01:51 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Lowerstate,
South Aiken also has two players committed to South Carolina. Geathers and Gustavson, will both play for USC as well. Should be fun.

#29184 05/14/05 01:55 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,427
coach
Offline
coach
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,427
Dudeman,
Why do you fear the yellow plaque so much? SA has to win or else the Irmo players/coaches will react as they did in 2002 when they lost to Wando...

#29185 05/14/05 02:22 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 833
brace
Offline
brace
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 833
quote:
Originally posted by Lowerstate4A:
While I agree that SA will when this game, your reasoning is alittle off base. NW was not loaded. They overachieved this year like they have in years past. I took a look at their website the other day and noticed only 3 seniors listed. When you look at their stats, none of the seniors registered any stats really. Next year, they bring back everyone, but one starter and could be considered loaded then.

Irmo however is loaded. They have two players who have already committed to USC. Monroe will definitely play somewhere. Not sure where Sani is headed, but it will probably be quality. Plus they have 12 or more seniors on their roster. So it appears that they are loaded.

I am really not sure what you are talking about here. Just because NW didn't have many starting Seniors does not make them an overachieving team. You don't have to have Seniors on your team to be good. NW has a very strong Junior class which made for a very good team this year.

#29186 05/14/05 02:45 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
J
world cup
Offline
world cup
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
quote:
Originally posted by 2004striker:
Dudeman,
Why do you fear the yellow plaque so much? SA has to win or else the Irmo players/coaches will react as they did in 2002 when they lost to Wando...

That reminds me.. I lost my clipping from The State of Joe Schmoe Irmo crying after the match.. [Mad]

#29187 05/14/05 04:01 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Well if seniors means you're loaded, I believe South Aiken is "half-way loaded," and in your case would make them an overachieving team, which in my opinion is bogus. Whatever they get they deserve and a state championship is most deserving. Half of the players have played with each other for years in classic club soccer and know each other very well (Goose, Gulick, Spencer, Sucher, Smith, etc.)...plus those that played club ball didn't overachieve when they made it to the National Championship

#29188 05/14/05 12:28 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
goal
Offline
goal
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
L-E, is that the game where the ref told Savitz there was 30 seconds left, then let the game go on another couple minutes, anyway? (maybe because he was enjoying the match so much?)

#29189 05/14/05 12:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
J
world cup
Offline
world cup
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
..maybe..I get it confused with the one that they said the center ref was a Spanish teacher at Dorman.. you know how it is.. when people lose.. they say all sorts of crazy things!

#29190 05/14/05 01:54 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Being from L-E, you would be very experienced about losing, Jack. But please don't comment on what you know nothing about; what it feel like to play for a championship, either winning or losing.

#29191 05/14/05 02:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
J
world cup
Offline
world cup
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
In my defense.. the guy from Flora brought-up the Wando game.. and dude from the Low Country brought-up the specifics of the match..

..touchy touchy..

#29192 05/14/05 03:07 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I am assuming that everyone on here has some kind of soccer experience. Any team can win or lose on any given day, and everyone, even the best players, has a bad game. But, take a coach who has led his teams to 27 championship games and come away with 22 of them..who can dispute that! Savitz is the real deal and he can take players and motivate them and make them Championship teams. A team is not about a player..they may factor in, but no team wins with just one all star. That is why Irmo wins. Savitz knows how to build a team. And there is not one player on this year's team, or any other for that matter, who doesn't play like a champion. I do not and never have played for him or Irmo, but I would've liked to benefit from his teaching. This is an opinion based on numbers, based on stats and based on experience being beat up by him. ha ha. I wouldn't want to go up against any of them with the "power" he has instilled in them. Whether it is Christian, Sani, Spencer, Moody, Zach or the Tight End. Who know who will win and who will lose today, the point is Savitz is a winner and so are his players.

#29193 05/14/05 03:21 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
guest1425... you are a class act. Whether being from Irmo or not, I agree with you. Thank you for saying it so eloquently.

#29194 05/14/05 03:56 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Yes, touchy. Was there 3 years ago, my son was one of the 5 (?) who stood up at midfield while Wando was being honored, although he felt cheated by the ref also. No offense meant to others at L-E.

#29195 05/15/05 04:04 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
J
world cup
Offline
world cup
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
I was there also..one of the greatest HS matches I've seen..


..should be another classic tonight.

#29196 05/14/05 07:23 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 347
corner kick
Offline
corner kick
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 347
i hope so...it'll be the first time i've been to a state championship when i wasn't affiliated with either team.

#29197 05/15/05 02:15 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Congrats to SA. You have a quick and very, very rough team. Irmo played very poorly though, had one goal that the official clearly missed, and still had chances to tie. Irmo just could not break through because of the SA roughness.

If you let one side get physical, you have to let both sides.

#29198 05/15/05 02:17 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
actually...that wasnt a goal contrary to all the irmo fan's opinions, i was on the goal line and it never crossed, savitz wasnt argueing that it crossed either, he as argueing a possible hand ball or hold, never the less Irmo should kick themselves for not finishing that chance, and once again for the record the ball never crossed the line.

#29199 05/15/05 02:38 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Your eyes are better than mine and many others then. I could not tell what he was arguing because of the noise level but the official sure did pull the yellow card out fast.

SA has a good team but this years Irmo team does not measure up to past teams. They were very inconsistent in the playoffs, never really playing a complete game from start to finish.

#29200 05/15/05 03:18 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
goal
Offline
goal
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
I have to give South Aiken credit. They came out hard at the get-go; and, as much as I hate to admit it, I feel that they played a better game, overall.

Geathers is an awesome player - I feel for the Irmo player who had to go against him most of the time, but he did about as good a job as anybody could have.

The SA keeper is very good - his arms looked like they stretched ten feet on some plays - there cannot be many keepers in the state who could get to some of the balls he did.

Irmo fought hard to get back in the game, but the SA defense just did not give them many opportunities.

I would not say that Irmo played poorly, but there were definitely some things they did not do well - like crossing the ball. I don't know how many times they crossed it directly to the keeper. You just can't score like that.

Anyway, again, South Aiken played great - very impressed with their hustle and their skill. Congratulations.

#29201 05/15/05 03:23 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
goal
Offline
goal
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
Off Sides, when Savitz goes off like that, you know it's a big one...he was definitely saying that an Irmo player was being held back by a SA player. The ref was already po'd at the Irmo camp after two or three of them jumped down his throat early in the game. He warned Savitz that he didn't want to hear anything else out of them - only Savitz.

#29202 05/15/05 03:57 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I love it we win states and you all say it is becasue irmo had a bad game. Think about this one... could they have played poorly due to the team they were playing? I must say I am biased becasue i am a starter for SA, but I also feel that you people should give us respect for our accomplishments. We beat Northwestern and Irmo, which all of you said we couldnt do. The goal you are all saying was a goal. I do agree it looked like one while i was on the feild, however on the news (Channel 6 out of Augusta) it clearly showed that the ball was a good 1 1/2 to two yards off of the line. Thanks to my team, our fans, coaches and Irmo you played a good game.

#29203 05/15/05 04:01 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Offsides... give Irmo a break! I'm so glad you were on the field with them. They fought hard. Can you actually give another team credit for winning instead of ridiculing your own team. Aiken was rough? How about Irmo? IT'S SOCCER. Congrats SA for a phenomenal year. The same to you Irmo! you both represent this state well!

#29204 05/15/05 04:04 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Great job, SA! Both teams represent this state well. Give cedit where credit is do...Off Sides... Irmo was just as capable as years past. I guess it looks a whole lot different from down on the field.

#29205 05/15/05 04:06 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Irmo & SA you both played great. Unfortunately, someone wins and someone loses. That doesn't mean both teams aren't winners outright. That SA goalie gave us a run for our money. He will be something else in college. Very impressive and one of the only players from SA to actually stand and clap as each of the Irmo players got their medals and trophy. That's class. As for Phil Savitz, folks it was a handball in the box. Just clarifying that, since I heard it from him and the other coaches. The linesman on our side was terrible. Never even called any of the throw ins. Just threw his flag straight in the air and let the center ref call them. That's not good. All in all a great game! Y'all can dispute the goal or not...doesn't matter. It's over...for this year..But Phil isn't done yet. Oh, and just to let y'all know..SA's coach came over after the game and told Phil.."I don't know how we did it, you guys beat the SH*# out of us!!! Thanks coach, that was a great compliment. Congrats SA..to Irmo - you guys are the real deal..always have been, always will be.

#29206 05/15/05 04:23 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Cograts SA.. Whatever else is written on this board doesn't matter.... there were 11 players on that field at all times. 1 player did not win this game! ...and to let you players know... you beat them{ kick the sh### out of them} forwards mids, defense, goalie... ITS SA MAGIC.. SA Rocks...! no excuses soccermom4eva your boys were good but ours happened to be better... so say GREAT JOB SA!

#29207 05/15/05 04:47 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 347
corner kick
Offline
corner kick
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 347
Congrats SA, i was pulling for irmo, and i couldn't really tell from where i was if anything happened in the box. I think people are over looking one very important thing. I never seen such a young player come into a game and make an impact like that...that #19 for irom..jugal something..he is gonna be good...get him some more playin time guys. He played well tonight under the pressure of the state championshp game..i am suprised nobody else has said anythign about him.

#29208 05/15/05 01:18 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
This is Coach Savitz from Irmo.
I wanted to express again my congratulations to South Aiken on a well played, exciting 4A match. I think both teams have much to be proud of this game and this year!

#29209 05/16/05 04:05 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 418
goal
Offline
goal
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 418
Coach Savitz can you explain why Irmo walked down the sidelines after receiving the Lower State trophy and turning your backs on the State Champions? We came down to watch the Eastside game but hung around to watch Irmo-SA and couldn't believe that Irmo just walked away. I'm sure there are alot of other teams that would have loved to be in your spot. After all, your still a champion, but just not the state's #1. Just seems a strange time for a team meeting when the champions are receiving their gold medals. [Confused]

#29210 05/16/05 04:22 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Always Right, I don't recall that happening... Both teams are class acts, and im pretty sure that Irmo hung around on the field longer than SA.

#29211 05/16/05 04:31 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 815
Brace
Offline
Brace
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 815
class act? Irmo? the same team that threw away their medals three years ago when we beat them? i didn't see the games yesterday, but i know they can't stand ending the season on a losing note. Irmo needs to learn how to lose with grace.

#29212 05/16/05 04:53 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I assume that was the Wando game, and that game was definitely decided by the refs...similar to last night.

It's hard to "lose with grace" when you feel like you've played two opponents at the same time.

To SA's credit, they played a similar game to Wando...a little bit of skill with a whole lot of physical play. The ref finally starting blowing the whistle in the second half, but the damage was done.

The refs let these games turn into something other than soccer.

#29213 05/15/05 05:44 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
J
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
Gimme a break New Refs. Yes South Aiken plays physical, but Irmo was playing against two opponents? You've absolutely got to be kidding me. Every time Jamal had his back to an Irmo defender they would just ram into him and throw a forearm into his back. But unlike Irmo players, he took it like a man and just played. I've never seen a more fragile player than Sani H. He's got great ball skills, but he must have fallen double digit times after barely being touched or taking a light tackle. South Aiken played hard and fair, they didn't turn the game into "something other than soccer" as our blind friend New Refs says. They took it to Irmo and just played harder. I give Irmo credit for the second half and how hard they pushed and attacked, but SA just wanted it more. If anything the ref was against SA getting WAY too card happy and calling ridiculous fouls on SA and non fouls on Irmo.

#29214 05/15/05 05:53 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 141
E
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
E
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 141
no offense to any of the SA players yal are real good, but without Jamal and Goose yall would not of won the game, or even gotton to the state championship game. Irmo controlled the game and played like champions. They got bad calls. but all in all congrats SA great job

#29215 05/15/05 05:57 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
always right...i think the fact that coach savitz got on the board to congratulate sa says enough about the class of irmo. yall just have to find something to say about irmo. you should have been showing some respect yourself and watching sa receive their medals if you think irmo was trying to be disrespectful. it sounds like you were showing just as much disrespect, as you call it, as irmo.

#29216 05/15/05 06:00 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Jamal took it like a man? Are you joking. The woman went down in the first half for three minutes and then got up and walked off under his own power. Lets not forget the match up on March 1 where he went down with a cramp every two seconds. Why don't yall get off your knees and stop trying to become Jamals new best friend

#29217 05/15/05 06:05 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
The bottom line is that Irmo was not as good as South Aiken. Deal with it, and let South Aiken have their year. Jeez you Irmo fans are such women. I can't believe I sat as close to you all as I did. I was ready to puke on every fan. Every call the ref made was terrible according to you all. It was sickening to hear you open your mouths. I almost swung on the cat in front of me for talking too much.

#29218 05/15/05 06:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
J
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
Savitz is a complete class act, no doubt. But, that does not even begin to make up for the rest of the Irmo team and fans. If Irmo doesn't win, then something went terribly wrong and it's everybody's fault but theirs. If they're such a dominant force they should've put one in the net and taken the game out of anyone else's hands. I'm suprised there is no crying about SA's goal and how the ref cost them that one too. Irmo needs to lose with grace and just say good game. There is absolutely no argument who the better team was and is. No Irmo crying can take that away from SA.

#29219 05/15/05 06:16 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
i was at the match and the refs did an even job, i would have preferred irmo to win but its interesting to see someone else on top, i hope no one else complains about the refs because they called a good game, not trying to be harsh but it seems to me some irmo fans are having trouble excepting the loss, i actually thought Irmo was getting alot of calls down the line by that side ref nearest to the fans, but i guess its a good thing the irmo fans are so shocked bc that just shows how much they expect to win and how much they have in the past, but it was interesting when the irmo fans continued to chant "irmo" after the game was over in a some what defying "we can still win" manner, but im sure it was just them sympathizing with their players, congrats to both teams (especially to SA, both teams had their high points in the game but SA to me obviously controlled the majority of the game (with out the refs help))

#29220 05/15/05 06:44 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Jeff Hardy......i couldnt agree more. We played as a TEAM we played rough because this was the biggest game of our lives. We played fair, hard, and with a lotta heart. That's it. This was our year to win and we weren't gonna let anyone take it away from us. As for what soccermom said about what our coach said to Coach Savitz after the game....well i'll leave that alone because they did physically beat us down at certain points in the game, but they didnt beat us when it came to schemes and formations and ball control. But then again, that quote can be taken many different ways. Irmo fought hard at the end of the game and they gave it there all, but this was just our year. Irmo is a dynasty at soccer and we were honored to play them twice this year. I look forward to seeing them agian next year.

#29221 05/15/05 06:51 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Very intense game by both squads. As to the controversial goal by Irmo, take a look at this picture, http://goirmo.com/images/ThePlay03.jpg
I think that it's pretty obvious that Irmo got screwed on that call, and nobody can argue because pictures do not lie.

#29222 05/15/05 06:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,420
World Cup
Online Content
World Cup
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,420
This is a bit of a "touchy" area for me to comment on, but I want to be on the record for a fair assessment of what I witnessed.

First off, it was an outstanding final between what I think most will agree on were the two best Class 4A boys teams in the state this season.

Now then, onto the postgame situation.

The SCHSSCA had been asked to make sure that proper decorum was followed after each match amongst the teams and the fans -- the security this weekend did a very good job in terms of crowd control and keeping things on time and in an efficient matter.

It was relayed to the SCHSSCA to make sure that proper respect was upheld by the Champion and Runner-Up during the trophy/medal presentation following each match.

Well, after Irmo was presented with the State Runners-Up trophy, a couple of Yellow Jackets hoisted the trophy, received the applause from the crowd, and then were called a few yards down field by their coaches toward the scoreboard end of the field. The team clearly had their backs turned toward the presentation of the State Championship trophy as their coaches addressed them after the match.

The SCHSL soccer liaison, Roger Hazel, informed Irmo Principal Gerald Witt and Athletics Director Bob Hanna about the lack of recognition Irmo was giving to South Aiken and Hanna responded to him with a comment of the sort, "I can't break up a team meeting", and did not intervene in the meeting. This from a football coach, who has been a Class 4A Runner-Up in two of the past three seasons -- 2002 (Division 2) and 2004 (Division 1).

I've known Phil Savitz, Dennis Cook, and others associated with the Irmo HS boys soccer program a long time and consider all friends. I truly respect the Yellow Jackets' tremendous history and soccer excellence -- no one has ever done it better between the lines in S.C. high school soccer.

But, as a parent of an Irmo player told me after the game, "Our boys just need to learn how to lose a little bit better."

As GOIRMO.COM states today on their fine website, from poet Edwin Markham, "Defeat may serve as well as victory to shake the soul and let the glory out." At the time he didn't know about Irmo boys soccer but was nonetheless prophetic about one of the nation's best programs ever. He was right and perhaps his words ring true for the Yellow Jackets today for one game, one loss, one day cannot mar a season of great accomplishment or quarter of a century of excellence. The remarkable trail of 15 championships, of hundreds of wins, of scores of great players and of a program built on class, character and consistency can be appreciated even more today than yesterday. There were no losers in this year's title game. Let the glory out. Congratulations to our Lower State champions on another outstanding season and a superb effort."

I wish the Irmo boys soccer team would have shown that 'glory' as well to South Aiken after the match.

http://www.goirmo.com/archives/bsoccer051505.htm

#29223 05/15/05 07:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,049
Brace
Offline
Brace
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,049
The pictures are inconclusive via NFL standards. There is a shadow on the line that could be balls shadow. Also the rules says it has to fully cross the line. No linesman could call that a goal because the ball would have been partly obstructed by the post. The center could not judge based on his depth. Indeed a close play and unfortunate ruling for Irmo, but at least the officials let the kids make the play and not "interfere" with the game.

#29224 05/15/05 07:13 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I agree fully with The Hammer according to the picture from what I'm seeing is that the ball didn't cross the line but then again it might have I don't know but u cant take that chamionship back SA won.

#29225 05/15/05 07:20 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
It's truly a shame that a few fans could make a whole team look bad. Irmo fans are passionate, no doubt, but please don't let the few who let their passion get away from them, until it turns to rudeness, mark a whole team. Most of us do agree that it was a great game, and believe it or not, as anyone who is honest with themselves should admit, we HATE that the boys didn't win, for no other reason than because they are our children! Who wants to see their child disappointed. In the same respect, we do congratulate SA on a great win. See I believe it's not SA or Irmo that perpetuates (Look it up) the back & forth, it is all the "well-meaning" fans and critics on this board. And it doesn't matter...not one bit, but the ball was in.

#29226 05/15/05 07:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
J
Brace
Offline
Brace
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
Soccer boy is my son and I am using his name to add my voice one final time in responce to all of you out there claiming that the ball didn't cross the line. The ball defititely without question crossed the line. I film for Irmo and have done so for the last 15 years and in all of the games filmed this is only the second time the ref team failed to make the call. The sideline guy just didn't make a call all night. If I remember right he only called offsides once the whole night. Had the call been made the game would have probably been decided by pk's. Congratulations to South Aiken on winning the state title.

This was my final game to film for Irmo and it has been a pleasure for all these years. I have seen boys become men and have watched & tasted great wins as well as watched & tasted defeat. I wish everyone could see the wall in my basement which is a tribute to one of the greatest programs in high school soccer. Good luck to Irmo in the future. I will forever be a part of your program.

With great pride I sign off.
Doug Gray

#29227 05/15/05 07:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
J
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
That picture is a very, very close call and if it was indeed a goal, then it doesn't suprise me that the linesman missed it. He missed two blatant balls out of bounds and awarded corners to Irmo and had some bad off sides call (non calls and actual calls). How do you have the State Championships with bad refs? It's beyond me. Hopefully next year the situation will be correted.

#29228 05/15/05 08:20 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
soccer boy's mommy.. if it crossed, it didnt cross enough to be called. Game over. SA wins..
get over it irmo.

#29229 05/15/05 08:30 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 24
bench
Offline
bench
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 24
Congrats to South Aiken for winning the state title and bringing recognition to the fact that soccer DOES exist in Aiken!

We're very happy for you and also very glad that Goose is graduating. Any chance that Jamal will graduate early?? [Wink]

#29230 05/15/05 09:09 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Wow, the picture convinces me.

web page

#29231 05/15/05 10:04 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 205
B
corner kick
Offline
corner kick
B
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 205
Go South Aiken The greatest team ever to go down in South Carolina history. This season should be turned into a video and sold on ESPN. order in the next ten minutes and get your free ESPN Hoodie.

#29232 05/15/05 10:09 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 833
brace
Offline
brace
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 833
It was in...It was out...

Guys, I don't know about you but I have been to several games this year and not one was without a very bad call by the ref. Sometimes those calls were very influential in the outcome of a game, sometimes they weren't. That doesn't excuse a bad call, but unfortunately they do happen. In a case like this the linesman or ref will most likely not make the call if it is not completely clear that it was over the line. After hearing everyone on this board talk about the call, it's pretty clear to me that it was not an obvious call to make. Personally I don't support either team but neither team can tell me that they did not get the benefit of a call in a close game somewhere this season and have me believe it. I'm sure that Irmo has received some favorable calls from referees this year and SA has had the same.

SA and Irmo are to be congratulated on having great seasons, and SA more so because they won something that many people didn't think they could. For the record, I will say that if what has been said on this board with regards to Irmo walking away from the SA recognition is true, then it shows a true lack of sportsmanship on the entire team. It's OK to be upset or mad about a loss but to me it shows a lack of character on Irmo this this is the second time the past few years that htis has happened.

#29233 05/15/05 10:12 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
haha go south aiken.......said by a gaffney fan....this is a kodak moment

#29234 05/15/05 10:23 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 815
Brace
Offline
Brace
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 815
as has already been posted the Irmo parent said her kids need to "learn how to lose". No kidding! This is not the first time they've shown a lack of class. In fact I was at the last one and could not believe a team with that reputation would act like that. It's a shame, but what are the general fans to do about it?????

#29235 05/15/05 10:35 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Cornerflag,

...a red card in the previous SA game and NW game ide say were pretty favorable to Irmo. For someone who says hes not bias you are quite quick to be so bias. At least this year its not, "Referees favor Irmo because Dennis Cook picks them personally" or "Referees always let Irmo get away with stuff," or " Refs always give Irmo the game."

In games i've seen this year, in order to hault prior season skepticism on Irmo and refs (particularly because Dennis Cook, a referee assigner, is on Irmo's sideline), refs have potentially become bias toward Irmo opponents.

This is just a theory, though... but i mean, hell if Irmo won every year, what would be the fun in that?

As for the sportsmanship issue:

I am sure that Phil Savitz would not purposefully put a blemish on his well known reputation of being one of the classiest coaches in High School soccer.

If you are going to be unbias, Cornerflag, then you can't attack one side and defend the other. Here is a defense for the side you so humbly attacked.

#29236 05/15/05 11:00 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 833
brace
Offline
brace
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 833
Futbol:

What the heck are you talking about? How am I biased against Irmo with what I said? Where did I defend SA? I think that you need to slow down and reread.

With regards to Savitz, again I did not say that it was on purpose, but the act, whether intentional or unintentional shows lack of respect.

#29237 05/15/05 11:10 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Just look at the SA guy's right leg which is on the goal line and you will see that the ball is behind his leg. However, the seasons over as some have said. Fame is fleeting anyway.

As far as officiating goes, I have seen worse, but remember they are human beings too.

#29238 05/15/05 11:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 134
B
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
B
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 134
this may be a little late to say this..but anyways...#19 for irmo played a amazing game on saturday...and he is only a freshman!!!..cant wait to see him play in a few years..congrats to SA for a great win and thanks to both teams for a very entertaining game!!

#29239 05/15/05 11:42 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Sorry to change the subject but...

Does anyone know what the shirts Goose and Jamal said on them? I can only imagine it was brilliant!

#29240 05/15/05 11:45 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
The shirts said "Carolina". Goose is going there next year and Jamal is going there as well but another year with the T-Breds first!

#29241 05/15/05 11:46 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 586
W
goal
Offline
goal
W
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 586
Carolina Soccer

#29242 05/15/05 11:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
J
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
They were USC soccer shirts. I thought it was pretty brilliant myself, I'm glad I didn't get to see if they would've pulled it off w/merely a tying goal or a goal to pull the lead to one. It was not over the top by any means. It was simple and creative, just the way a game winning goal celebration should be.

#29243 05/15/05 11:55 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
yet they both got yellowcarded

#29244 05/16/05 12:00 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 441
B
goal
Offline
goal
B
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 441
I might the lone voice in the wilderness on this one, but to me it was extremely foolish to get a yellow card in this manner in the state championship game.More so for Jamal than Goose because to me it limits your aggressiveness on challenges to the ball.No way could SA afford either player to go out with 2 yellows. I ,like everyone, else enjoys a spontaneous celebration but I'm not sure this was the right time to do that. Maybe a goal for a 2-0 lead would be OK,but not a 1-0 lead in the first half of the state championship game. Save the yellow.Just my opinion. Not trying to be a spoilsport only a realist.

#29245 05/16/05 12:03 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
actually only geathers got yellowcarded

#29246 05/16/05 12:05 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
yeah...the fact that it risked them getting two and being out is a good point, but i think they should allow celebrations, it doesnt hurt the game and goals in soccer are huge, especially in big games

#29247 05/16/05 12:06 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I agree, they were taking a chance but I'm going to counter your statement with your statement. It WAS the state championship! The excitement, the hype...they had to do something out of the ordinary, especially Goose being a senior, needed something to go out on!
I'm sure one of the news cameras caught it...Stuart Scott wants a copy! [Wink]

#29248 05/16/05 12:10 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
i was happy to see it, made the game more professional

#29249 05/16/05 12:10 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
When Zach Prince asked the referee why he failed to card Goose for his actions along with Jamal the ref told him "I didnt see him take his shirt off, I only saw him putting his jersey back on"

#29250 05/16/05 12:13 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
yea...i think thats kind of weird reasoning, and it looked to me the ref wanted to card goose, but the ref could turn around and see a player bleeding on the ground, but if he didnt see it he cant call it (kind of a different situation), but as far as he knows Goose took it off to adjust it, possibility of reasonable doubt, but i think if he carded geathers he should have goose, even though once again im glad they did it

#29251 05/16/05 12:16 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Again congrats to SA on a strong finish to a great season. You were the better team last night and you got the greater benefit of the calls or lack of calls.

As to the rest of you, when you actually string together more than one championship in a row, or even actually win one, then maybe you can tell Coach Savitz and his players what they should or shouldn't be doing. I think they've got it figured out pretty well. I've known him for 24 years, and he's one heck of a coach and a nice person. The fact that he comes on here himself and congratulates the opponent again apparently isn't good enough for some.

Act like you've been there before.

#29252 05/16/05 12:19 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 441
B
goal
Offline
goal
B
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 441
Like I said, maybe after a goal to go 2-0. I'm an old football(oblong)coach, so I tend to see things as a coach might. Hey, I love a good celebration though.
Brings to mind a great celebration I saw on that same field years ago. USC was playing Charleston Southern in the NCAA's and the CSU fans were ragging on Mathis unmercifuly. After scoring a goal he ran to the CSU student section pulling his shirt off and hold ing it up so they could see his name on the back. Of course Yellow Card follows. This really fired up the CSU fans then.Later in the game Mathis scores again and remembering the earlier yellow card, he ran directly to the center ref, stopped and neatly tucked his shirttail in. Hilarious.

#29253 05/16/05 12:19 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Hey just a question?

Was Jamal Geathers hurt Saturday, but is that how he normally played? I saw him limping around, and didn't play to the expectations I thought he would (being the best player in state) but I just figured it was because he got hurt.

#29254 05/16/05 12:21 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
hurt his foot on a shot...he didnt get hit or anything...i just think he caught it on the ground when he struck the ball and i know that hurts like hell...can anyone confirm?

#29255 05/16/05 12:32 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
World Cup
Offline
World Cup
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
God Bless South Aiken. I was on the team that one the first ever region championship in '97 and it makes a man proud to see how far they have come.

p.s. Jeff Hardy will face FIFA 2004 soon...

#29256 05/16/05 12:34 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Thanks Defender, but may I ask what makes him good? Like some people are good with skill, ball control, shots, speed, tricks, and things like that.

#29257 05/16/05 12:35 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
J
goal kick
Offline
goal kick
J
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 109
quote:
Originally posted by New Refs
Again congrats to SA on a strong finish to a great season. You were the better team last night and you got the greater benefit of the calls or lack of calls.

As to the rest of you, when you actually string together more than one championship in a row, or even actually win one, then maybe you can tell Coach Savitz and his players what they should or shouldn't be doing. I think they've got it figured out pretty well. I've known him for 24 years, and he's one heck of a coach and a nice person. The fact that he comes on here himself and congratulates the opponent again apparently isn't good enough for some.

Act like you've been there before.

Speak for yourself, you can't even say congratulations without throwing a cheapshot in there about the refs and trying to taint SA's win. IMO, SA did not receive the greater benefit of calls. Irmo easily got the majority of calls and could not take advantage of it. Nobody has taken a shot at Savitz and everything I've read about him has said he is total class, which I think he is. Nobody has complained about him whatsoever, so before you post a comment about people, take a second to read and make an educated post.

Act like you have class

#29258 05/16/05 12:43 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Jeff Hardy,

SA's win is tainted.

The supposed untainted win (click here)

Irmo recieved the majority of the calls? If I were Irmo I would give up all the calls in the game for this one.

#29259 05/16/05 12:48 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
quote:
Irmo recieved the majority of the calls? If I were Irmo I would give up all the calls in the game for this one.
I KNEW I WASN'T BLIND! I caught that on TAPE, and watched it over and over, and I still said it was in the goal.

#29260 05/16/05 12:48 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
World Cup
Offline
World Cup
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
I'm sorry, what did you say fanatic? I couldn't hear you, because all I heard was...

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/sports/11650814.htm

#29261 05/16/05 12:49 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 441
B
goal
Offline
goal
B
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 441
Futbofanatic, remember, the WHOLE ball must be over the line.To me I couldn't make that determination from this photo.Not the whole ball.

#29262 05/16/05 01:14 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
On another footage it looks in as well... if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck...

#29263 05/16/05 02:03 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
World Cup
Offline
World Cup
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
...and if the scoreboard said 1-0 and the paper said 1-0 then...

#29264 05/16/05 02:05 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Wasnt that the 2nd time SA beat Irmo this year?

#29265 05/16/05 02:10 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
quote:
Originally posted by defender-17:
actually only geathers got yellowcarded

goose said something along the lines of him receiving a yellow but only one player having to leave the field?

#29266 05/16/05 02:11 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
only one left the field because goose didnt get a card

#29267 05/16/05 02:12 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Goose didnt get yellowcard

#29268 05/16/05 02:16 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
and yes, SA beat irmo 3-1 i believe earlier..


and jamal did hurt his foot on a shot by kicking the ground..

and why are you still whining about that one shot? didnt south aiken have a shot like that to an open goal that was touched out by a defender at the last second? before jamal's goal? quit complaining bc you loss and you cant accept that SA won.

#29269 05/16/05 02:18 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
South Aiken beat Irmo 2-1 not 3-1 earlier on March 1. Irmo played down a man for 75 minutes of that game due to an early red card.

#29270 05/16/05 02:27 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
any other photo angles?

#29271 05/16/05 02:34 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
YEah there is a great one with the SA players in front of the scoreboard at the end of the game.

#29272 05/16/05 02:36 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
World Cup
Offline
World Cup
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
Oh, rjw, that was the best post of this whole thread!

#29273 05/16/05 02:48 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
LOL that was a good one.

R1c, who else was on that team.. 97 wasnt it? your senior year?.. you won region over Aiken with Scott Bradford?

#29274 05/16/05 03:09 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
World Cup
Offline
World Cup
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,768
Junior year, I'm not that old. Roseberry, Chapin, Corley, Bessinger, Buley, Swede, Monahon brothers, Reynolds, and Ross L.

#29275 05/16/05 03:46 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
J
Brace
Offline
Brace
J
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 824
You know, being an Irmo supporter I may have a biased opinion, but I just got back this evening from a college graduation and looked at the pictures and videos of the game for the first time. I have had no contact with anyone since the game, and I just looked to see how and why Irmo lost. It is unfortunate that a game like this had to be decided with a possible missed call. I think it is getting interesting that many, many years championships are determined by missed calls. Why not put two refs on either side of the goal at either end to watch for the ball crossing the end line? This would allow for more eyes to see if the ball crossed. Look at all the referees that football uses. It may make sense to use that many in high stakes games such as the state championship. Just a thought.....

#29276 05/16/05 12:13 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Not being from SA or Irmo I have witnessed the last 3 state finals. This match was officiated very well but i do remember last years referee being much better than this years. LAst year the game was much more in control.

#29277 05/16/05 12:48 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
In case ya'll were wondering....when jamal hurt his foot.....he did it by kicking the bottom of the defender's cleats. It hurt like cornhole and he was in pain. He said he couldn't even run.

#29278 05/16/05 01:25 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I have to know, is there any possibility that in a game, such as the games played on Saturday, there could be extra referees assigned or would that only add to confusion? I think it is a great idea, but I don't know enough about specifics to know if it could actually ever happen. I have to say, it is truly a good thing to see people so passionate about soccer!!! This thread has gone on forever - some feeling one way, some the other. Soccer has sure come a long way and it's great to see everyone taking such a big interested, no matter who you root for! I watched many of the games Saturday - I saw a defender from Socasstee (sorry if I spelled that wrong) Jump in front of the goal and save a shot that was on it's way in - AWESOME! I saw the goalie from SA make a diving save GREAT! I watched the goalie from IRMO nail a ball away in the upper 90! This was an exciting day! With a lot of memorable moments and a true day of Champions all around. It really doesn't matter who won or why (of course, to the teams who won and lost it does), but the fact is we got to see the best of the best come out and show their stuff. It was GREAT! Thank you boys for giving us a great day to watch some great soccer! You are all winners!

#29279 05/17/05 12:40 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Hey guys. I just wanted to congratulate the SAHS T-Breds on a phenomenal season and Irmo on a great one. In response to "the play", I was at the game, in the South Aiken student section. We all thought the ball went in the net and thought the net moved as though a goal had been scored. I got home, looked at the pictures, and at first glance thought we had gotten lucky. But upon a closer look, the ball actually never crosses the line. The angles the Goirmo.com uses are all from about a 45 degree angle. The ball appears to be in the goal. If you look at the shadow of the ball, it never crossed the line fully. Also, the shadow reveals the defenders leg to be across the goal line, and the ball just behind it. Since we have no depth, you can't say the ball is in in a 2-D photo. It never crossed the line. And for the "handball", if you look at the video, again you must realize it is at an angle, the ball does appear to hit our defender's shoulder, but when you consider the angle, that isn't possible. It had to have hit his upper chest.

#29280 05/17/05 01:33 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
quote:
got home, looked at the pictures, and at first glance thought we had gotten lucky.
I love the way you say you can't see a goal through PICTURES! I mean sure I can take a picture of a ball before it goes in and say that is proof it didn't go in.

I have it on Video from the Irmo-side (don't get me wrong, I'm a South Aiken fan, but just knew where the action was going to be if yall catch my drift [Wink] ) and I've played it over and over, and see it going in, but it never hits the net, I think its a defender that hits the net trying to get it out.

#29281 05/17/05 02:36 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I really don't think it went in, at least from Irmo's pics. At least admit that. It may have, but in Irmo's pictures, it does NOT cross the line fully. The video feedback isn't in high resolution, so if you can digitize or something try and prove us wrong.

#29282 05/17/05 03:08 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
why does it matter? the game is over. and South Aiken won. Oh wait, its because Irmo cant take a loss-- its gotta be the ref's fault.

#29283 05/17/05 03:14 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Dex i believe that Statechamps just re-bumped this thread up, not an Irmo fan. in fact the last 4 posts (the ones you comment about) are SA fans. I swear, some people just search for reasons bad mouth Irmo.

#29284 05/17/05 03:14 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
just cause the shadow of the ball is on the line doesnt mean the ball isnt over the line, you have to take in acount of at which the lights are on the ball. If it wasn't a goal it was at least a hand ball but lets just drop it. Congrats to SAHS for a very successful season and a great championship run.

#29285 05/17/05 03:16 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
In the Goirmo.com pic the shadow isnt on the line its behind the line... the shadow is on the line in the 3rd pic, behind it in the 5th.

-just for clarification.

#29286 05/17/05 11:44 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
goal
Offline
goal
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
It's all a hoax, people!!! Can't you see it - it's right before your very eyes! There never really WAS a game...it's all a Hollywood-type movie production set-up by the CIA. Look at the pictures again - there's a guy holding a boom mic in the third picture - he accidentally steps from behind the fake background. And, at that time of day, the sun should have been shining from the OTHER direction - the shadow should have been on the OTHER side of the line. That's also the reason why the balls were so crappy - obviously, the CIA did not do their research well enough to know that nobody uses Spaulding soccer balls. What is wrong with you people?!?!

#29287 05/18/05 01:10 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Marcoefan:

Freedom of speech is great! However, I do not remember the Bill of Rights saying that you have to be on the field to comment. Maybe it is a new Amendment.

I just call it like I see it. If you or anyone else does not agree. Fine, that is what make the world of sports so much fun.

Any discussion about the Irmo-SA game or any other game can only make the sport even better and more fun.

Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 14 15

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.513s Queries: 306 (0.287s) Memory: 4.3405 MB (Peak: 5.6066 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-10 20:53:27 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS