Ok, "that is all the logic you need to know, it only makes sense that we would beet AM."... "beet"? What are you going to do? turn us into vegetables, THEN maybe you would have a chance of "beet"ing us? Seriously. You also lost to CC 1-0, but at ya'll lost twice in regulation. We lost both times in post regulation. Just because you scored once on them means nothing. There are three situations for how the 2-1 game could have turned out, and none of them make it justifiable that you could beat us.
A) CC up 2-0, subs in weaker players, SCS pops one in, 2-1
B) CC up 1-0, SCS scores one, making it 1-1, or 0-0, tied up. Just the same as us. But our defense was strong enough to push them into overtime, ya'll lost in regulation.
C) Same as B) except SCS scores first, CC scores second, same situation
Therefore SCSkeep, its is YOU who has faulty logic. If you want me to go into latin fallacies I can, but I have a feeling you wouldn't understand them.
You could even put it this way. In your two games against CC, you played 160 minutes. We were able to push them into 200.
Let the field tell the story.
