SC Soccer Forums SCSoccer.com Forums Boys Varsity Soccer SCISA '05-'06

I would say that BL and CN are probably gonna make the playoffs for sure. Both have had good teams fore several years now. That region has been there's for the taking and losing the last couple of years and I think it still is.

Heathwood Hall should bring back another pretty solid team. The seniors they lost were crucial to the championship run they made at the end of last season. Although i played some on there indoor team this year, i could tell that these guys loved to play together. and yes zurcher and alpie are very solid players.

I dont know... they lost their goalie, who was really good. I mean look at CN last year: great team with a weak keeper and they loose in the semis cause he lets in some weak shots... If HH wants to go anywhere this season, they need to find a decent goalie. Funny though, BL, CN, and Hammond lost their goalies too... should be interesting

big boy... alpert? a key player, you make me giggle. all i remember about that kid is barely being able to make the JV team at dutch fork. i know he has improved some and this is scisa, but calling him an impact player is going a little too far.

that is another interresting thing with BL, Cn, Hammond, and HH all losing there starting goalies....any idea who would be the all area goalie..WH's maybe?

yeah is big boy alpie from heathwood hall?

csc#12. It is so good to hear from someone so knowledgeable about the game. Long on opinions, short on facts. Yes Cn should do well next year. Let me give you a series of facts, not opinions. CN was ranked by ALL pollsters # 1 last year. Until playing Heathwood in the final SCISA game of the season, their "weak" goalie had not allowed a goal from ANY Scisa team all season. The goal allowed in the regular season was by a sweeeper who tried to keep the ball away from a Highlander forward. He kept retreating from the 18 yard line all the way to the box.I guess he was trying to show off his "superior" ball handling skills. He lost that battle even though the "weak" keeper was screaming "away" several times! The second SCISA goal, again by Heathwood, was the same sweeper waiting stationary at the 18 for the forward to dribble up and manaeuver around he and the goalie for another score. The "weak" keeper was again screaming "away". In all fairness this sweeper made the all region team but is the same one who has let down the CN football team by not showing up for practice and getting suspended. The "weak" CN keeper did missplay a corner kick and pushed it into the goal himself.3 SCISA goals all season, 12 against all oponents, including ranked public schools, only 3 losses. That is pretty "weak" (sarcasm intended) The keeper, sweepers and midfield banded together to make an almost inpentrable wall on defense.What the midfield let through, the sweepers stopped, what the sweepers missed, the keeper stopped. The ideal concept of a team. CN vs BL was a classic game with both keepers making dramatic saves to keep their team in the game. CN 1 BL 0. BL keeper region keeper of the year(a senior) CN keeper (a sophomore) has transferred to a public school. By the way, the SCISA championship game was won in OT because CN players missed their shots, outside the frame, including one from a 8th grader. On paper CN was dominated by seniors but the majority of starting players were sophomores and juniors. If they can find another "weak" keeper, they should do well again.The biggest problem with these type of boards is that anybody, including me, can state "facts". Mine are verifiable, are yours?

CSC #12 woops, want to keep the facts straight, the championship game was won on PK's NOT OT. Sorry I misspoke .

Wasn't the SCISA Championship game won by Pinewood?

yes it was won 1-0, not by PK's and not in OT by Pinewood over HH.