I read the posts a lot and comment seldom. Now that the MPSC and BFA have posted their U16-U18 team selections for next season, there are interesting things to note:
1) It is obvious that these 2 clubs compete for a lot of the same kids. You see a lot of the same names selected by both clubs. Wouldn't they get a commitment before posting the names? It only adds to the debate.
2) If the BFA is about selecting the "best" and concerned with developing elite players, why is the U17 girls team made up of a lot U16 players and many girls that have never played above classic level? If you compare this list to the MPSC lists, a lot of the BFA 90 Gold girls were assigned to classic teams in MPSC. It gives the appearance that BFA is more interested in numbers, which equals money to the club. If these girls are not true challenge level players, will they be competitive playing up in age and talent level? Are these kids best interests being served?
3) There were several posts concerning coaches being assigned to more than one team in MPSC. If you look back at BFA, you would see the same thing. Clark, Jason, Shilo, etc. all coached more than one team last year. They coach one team that only plays in the fall season (U15-U18) and one team that plays both seasons. In addition, it allows the best coaches to receive more pay; thus, it is easier to maintain these coaches in the clubs. The point is that a lot of clubs do this, not just MPSC.
I always find the tryouts and competition for players (and their money) intersting to watch. It always adds fuel to the debate. It will be interesting to watch as the U15 and below teams are announced in the near future.
Good luck to all next season.