Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 8 of 10 1 2 6 7 8 9 10
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
B
throw in
Offline
throw in
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
i still think its crazy that you think the #11 team in the state, Dreher, can compete with Riverside. Riverside has 1 loss to Greenville 1-0. yall lost to mauldin who Riverside beat 3-0 and Eastside beat 3-0 and 4-1 and greenville beat 5-0. and goodluck getting past riversides defense just so you know 3 of their 4 backs play together on the same club team, Cesa U17 Premier. so lets just all agree that Dreher has ZERO chance of beating Riverside or Daniel


everyone is a lil bias, im realistic.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
B
throw in
Offline
throw in
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
Socitome: You think Socastee has it in the bag for next year? How about Eastside? with 0 seniors


everyone is a lil bias, im realistic.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 61
8
throw in
Offline
throw in
8
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 61
now dont say they have 0 chance. crazier things have happened.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17
L
bench
Offline
bench
L
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17
is logisic a word, i think i meant logical, haha. this will be my last post for a while. but this was a good argument though, really good. i love debates. good luck to everyone in the playoffs.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
B
throw in
Offline
throw in
B
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
haha im sure crazier things have happened im just yet to have seen one. but yea goodluck to everyone


everyone is a lil bias, im realistic.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17
L
bench
Offline
bench
L
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17
i know i said that would be my last one, but i ahve to get yalls opinion on this, DO YOU THINK BC SHOULD BE RANKED #7?

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 61
8
throw in
Offline
throw in
8
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 61
HAHAHA no! Bc should not be #7. I think there best game was a tie vs riverside. there overrated. But they do have an amazing Goalie. but the goalie cant win the game. those rankings are messed up. but much to yalls suprise flora is #12. yall remarked earlier that we wernt.

Last edited by 89scsoccer19; 04/27/07 02:40 AM.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17
L
bench
Offline
bench
L
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17
yeah i think that absurd also, but go on this website and look at teams scheduels taht they have palyed, no one besdies greenville has played that hard schedule. right now i think its greenville than everyone else. but not too many teams have had that many strong schedules. check this out. haha dreher isnt the only one who has played a weak schedule. http://216.27.84.134/cgi-bin/sirkpt1.pl?...=01&Sport=s, our schedule was no where near the strongest, but we took care of buisness. haha but check that site out!!

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 61
8
throw in
Offline
throw in
8
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 61
but now watch Heise get on here and post some stats and stuff as to why BC is #7 haha.
no offense Kevin and Kyle, its all good fun.

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 75
J
throw in
Offline
throw in
J
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 75
The fact of the matter is I'm tired of seeing all of this BS. Dreher has a couple of talented players but besides that they will not make it very far in the Playoffs. I'm tired of these freakin teams out here that lost a game and have freakin excuses to why they lost. Maybe it wasn't your day. Maybe the other team wanted it more than you. But just like everyone has a @#$%^#, I guess everyone has a opinion to why they lose. And on the rankings, pretty much as you can see it's like the BCS rankings. Playing a tough schedule will bump a team up. You teams out here complaining, toughen up the schedule. STOP DUCKING TEAMS JUST SO YOU CAN HAVE A PRETTY RECORD THAT WON'T GET YOU ANYWHERE!!!


Cowards die many times before their deaths, the valiant never taste death but once.
Page 8 of 10 1 2 6 7 8 9 10

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 5.4.45 Page Time: 0.348s Queries: 34 (0.134s) Memory: 3.2032 MB (Peak: 3.5867 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-03 12:09:15 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS