I don't understand. It seems to me that to be considered overrated, that somewhere down the line some source, ie sports media, would have to state an individual is 'the best' or 'top rated'. Then there would be a basis for giving opinions about whom is overrated. Where are these ratings that declare who these players are that are overrated. Only one I've seen of late was Enzo. To state he is overrated, well didn't he just sign to play at UNC, which was in the NCAA championship game. So the coaches that signed him don't know much about recruiting and how to evaluate talent I guess. I wish I knew as much about everything as some of the pos(t)ers do.