These questions have read not so much like requests for information, but rather attempts to publicly call people out based on information that the "questioners" seem to imply that they already know. Not claiming to be inside anyone's head--just stating how it sounds to an outside reader. The combination of card-stacking on issues that may or may not directly affect the success of this particular endeavor, plus the insistence on public speculation rather than contacting those who know directly, only support this impression.
Something that seems like an attack is naturally going to prompt a defensive stance; can't blame anyone for not wanting to get drawn into what seems like a public assault. I have a feeling those who are heading an effort to truly benefit the players in this state would be happy to answer any objective, relevant questions of policy or procedure, either personally or publicly.
