Quote:


They had a succesful fall? The 92's finished in 25th place of 26 teams in the ECNL B division. They didn't win a game in ECNL. Is that your definition of success? Raise the bar for yourself a little bit. If I am a college coach attending one of these events I'm not going to waste my time watching the 25th ranked team in the B division(51 out of 52 including the A division). I'm going to go watch the teams in the A division.

25. CESA Premier ECNL U18 0.33 3 9 W-0 T-3 L-6 GF-7 GA-20
GD-13

I'm familiar with the 92's. I don't know of any that was on the team that committed to the fall season, then quit. The 5 that I know that quit, quit before tryouts.

And we both post on this board, no problem with that. This is a great forum for parents to get both sides of a story. I'm sure a club director doesn't want parents on it though, it exposes to much dirty laundry.




Yes, a successful Fall. So many times I've heard people on here complain that it's all about winning. Now, I'm suggesting that a group of kids playing competitively through the fall, committing to play next year, and winning state cup and going to regionals a successful year. Are you saying that because they didn't win more games, they weren't successful?

Yes, nothing wrong with posting on the board but I'm not the one who had a problem with people 'always on here'. I just pointed out that I'm not in the club forum nearly as much as some people whose daughters don't play club anymore.

I'm still waiting to hear which 'families and kids' I've been 'attacking'. Any help with that?

I guess that since there were several very good players on the 92s, it's a good thing that you aren't a college coach. Many thought it was a good idea to go watch them play.

I actually talked to 3 of the players that quit last year. All 3 said that they were leaving because they were not going to make the premier team. I don't have a problem with that, other than to say that they left because they weren't good enough. They had been with CESA for years and in my opinion were good players, good challenge level players. Nothing wrong with that, I just don't see how you can blame CESA for situations like that.