Quote:

the score really has nothing to do with it.
deltadog has a legit gripe. its too bad he didn't email the coach before all the $/time he comitted to the tourny & asked him directly, in case of conflict which team will you be coaching?...to confirm said club policy.
the cynic in me thinks that the coach/club decided that they had milked all the $ out of the older girls & that they still had to woo the younger boy$ back for another year.
no rip on cesa, don't know anything about them, just a thought on clubs in general maybe


Sandman, once my daughter was on the roster last summer, they could count on her for Regionals if the team made it. Had I asked your question and been told the policy had changed I would have expressed my concerns then. But, given the at-any-time-the-policies-can-change-to-suit, no-policy policy endorsed by Harry what would the answer to my question have meant? Anything? Nothing?

I really don't think the decision was about the money, and I do think the decision made was very difficult for Shelley. In the end I think it came down to total lack of "what if" preparation for a coaching conflict by those looking out for the '94 team resulting in the decision made impacting the '92 team who should have had priority.

But, take a look at conehead's question with a slight modification and one eye on Nationals. What would the boys team have said if RS had been called back to Greenville for a family emergency, and the boys lost?