I just read the day's postings from the time I was on this morning until now. DD, you just can't convince me that this would have been an issue at all had the 92s won like they did in the 2nd game. You said that you voiced your concern about not having Russell at that game and I guess we have to take your word for it. They won 1-0 and nobody would have ever known you were upset. The exact same circumstances with regards to coaching the team occured two days later with Russell being absent, only this time the team lost. Now, more than 72 hours later, you're still upset about it. What was different other than the score and your reaction? You-know-I'm-slow-in-understanding-so-break-it-down-for-me-again. (not sure what the hyphens were for)
