In my experience, there is little to be gained by setting two potentially positive influences at odds with one another; for every benefit there is a cost, which may or may not be greater than the gain.
If the USWNT has reached the top level of world competition using the current formula--which may or may not work better for female athletes than for males--then what is the potential gain that is worth the risk of cost?
Thank goodness Title IX ensures that our WNT can have the same mediocre results that out MNT has
