Originally Posted By: Chuck607
The conversation isn’t about what is better or worse, the conversation is about recognizing a great opportunity for low country girls that want to be recruited. To simply post negative crap all day about anything that isn’t ECNL is absurd and naive. To think that if your kid doesn’t play at SCUFC or CESA your kid won’t get recruited or offered a chance to play in college...dumb. Yes when it comes to the best opportunity to play in college CESA ECNL by far is the best avenue to that, no question. With that said, USA and GPS have done a superb job in the recruiting process to surpass SCUFC and their ECNL program despite not being able to get an ECNL program. As far as budgets and how schools are recruiting kids, if your kid is wanting to play at an in state school don’t be fooled to think that S.C. school doesn’t attend any local events including ODP and Viking Cup.



I think you're projecting here and putting wording into peoples mouths. No one said any of the things you are imagining. And, I don't see anyone posting 'negative crap' here except for you.

The thread was about the DA folding and possible leagues teams would go to (and the possible 'pecking' order of those leagues). All seemed fine. If you don't want to discuss that, no problem, start another thread about how great the GAL is. I am sure people will post there and affirm that the GAL is indeed shaping up to be a great league. Which I would certainly agree with!