Thanks Hurst... point is still the same why was NW reversed and Gilbert not... 8-7 vote in the executive committee means there was considerable disagreement in the penalty... Would very much like to see who voted which way.
I am surprised that a public institution does not have more public information on the verdicts including rationale to overturn a decision. At least none that I can find.
my whole point is simple ... rules should be enforced equally and I still think that Gilbert got shafted. So either we have the rules or we do not. That is the essence of rules to be black and white...not gray, to compete under the same conditions.
