Good point Striker. Although I'm just going simply on results. BC 01-02 went to the state finals. Then they finish lower-state runner up in 06. Obviously, BC puts out quality product every year and they do more with what they are "given" than perhaps any other team in the state when researching their demographics. BC is probably the exception to every stereotype in the state. There are a lot of good "teams" year in and year out in SC but there are very few "programs" like BC. Maybe that's because there's only one coach Heise who puts more work into SC Soccer and his team than any other coach in the state. Point is that there are schools who are consistently loaded with 20 soccer players every year and then there are others who make the best of what they have. That's HS soccer.
Hurst,
Perhaps that change happens with the election of a new Liason when OLE ROGER steps down at the end of this year. Hopefully we get someone who has a little sense about athletics/multiple sports and is not just in-tune with one sport to make a difference. You also have to understand that the SCHSL is full of lazy people who want to do as little as possible for sports they don't care about. Unfortunately, for Jerome Singleton, soccer is a sport he doesn't care about. They care more about how many ejections soccer has than whether or not ties should stand. You have to understand Hurst, this state, and a large percentage of the people who live in it, are stupid and narrow minded. If it's not in there little "realm" they don't pay attention, don't want to pay attention, and don't see any merit in you paying attention. The easy thing for them to do would be let a Kevin Heise coordinate with a selected panel of SC coaches to design a rule-book for soccer and all they would have to do would be implement it...however they choose the lazy-easier solution of lump everything together under one book while they basically collect their salaries, do very little, and ruin the seasons of teams who misinterpret their horribly written rules.
