Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#106904 07/01/08 10:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,476
Likes: 2
World Cup
World Cup
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,476
Likes: 2
7/1/08

U.S. could be used as late substitute for 2010 World Cup
http://www.boston.com/sports/articles/2008/07/01/us_could_be_used_as_late_substitute/
Frank Dell'Apa, Boston Globe (MA)

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 90
L
throw in
throw in
L Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 90
Can't be Europe (Germany '06)...
Can't be Asia (Japan/S. Korea '02) and Beijing Olympics...
Can't be South America (Brazil '14)...

This leaves only four options in my mind: Australia (enough stadiums, but they are meant for rugby, plus not enough market draw), Morocco (finished 2nd in host voting in three of last four World Cups), Mexico (large enough stadiums, and great market draw, but probably couldn't organize within one year), and U.S. (probably the best at organizing, lack of big enough stadiums, unless some football stadiums constructed wider field sizes, decent market draw, and IMO would draw most international fans).

I know this scenario is extremely unlikely. However, what if Atlanta or Charlotte hosted some matches...


We all dream of a team of Carraghers...
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 545
goal
goal
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 545
If the United States were to hold a world cup here I would be erratic.


I hate floppers
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 2
C
Coach
Coach
C Offline
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 2
Ok, I have to ask...did you mean ecstatic...or didn't you?


I've got good news and bad news...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0