Quote:

These are poor achievements and you as a coach should see that.



Actually, MP, if you truly understood, these achievements that are being discussed could be very positive and not accurately labeled as poor. You would have to go back to some of the discussion concerning MPSC not joining Bridge. The organizers at MPSC, rightfully or wrongfully, put their focus on developing their academy and subsequently the academy age players, rather than taking a route which would have lead to a more consolidated approach with Bridge. The more consolidated approach with Bridge would have been at the older ages, not the academy ages. But, like I said earlier, these ages aren't normally talked about very much, but it is the foundation of the older ages.

So while MPSC appears to currently be struggling with the older ages, which by the way tend to have the more vocal parents, when the "my child" attitude, and parental convenience kicks in, they appear to be doing something right with the younger ages. As I said in one of the aforementioned earlier threads, only time will tell if MPSC made the correct decision to avoid the consolidation with Bridge, and focus on the younger ages, with an eye toward the future of MPSC. But the cited, in your opinion, poor results, seem to indicate it's working.