Np question turf fields are great during periods of heavy rain and absolutely terrible on warm sunny days. I'd say they're a good choice for cold climates where beautiful grass fields can't be grown.
My primary concern has always been the potential for an increased incidence of bacteria build up over time resulting in a higher probability of a player contracting a staph infection from the surface through a new or old wound.
It would be nice to know if the district has thoroughly researched this particular variable before proceeding with the installations. I'm not a biologist, but I would think the chance of contracting such an infection from a natural surface is much lower than contracting such an infection from an artificial surface.
Can anyone offer some evidence to show otherwise. I hope there is no difference but I can see how there can be.
Here's an informative article on the issue:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=alxhrJDn.cdc
