Actually just to set the record straight for you Hurst, Clover was THE III/IV Champion. You can think what you want BUT the fact is the Clover won it outright on tiebreaker. Whether you chose to accept that or not is your choice but it is a matter of fact. If the roles were reversed I strongly believe you would be defending your position. Yes it was a close race but there was only one champ not two. That's why there are rules in place to settle who is the champ. I don't see anywhere in the SCHSL handbook about co-champs. In regards to NW and Sptnbrg I agree with you on the latter but not the former. IMHO NW is not on Clovers level. Last year @ NW they (NW/Cesar) put us on a what I'd generously call an 8v8 size field to negate our speed adv. and played...I'll kindly call, aggressive. Nothing has probably changed. What I'd like to know from what I hear is how can 2 girls, who are neighbors play on different teams? 1 on NW the other on RH..kinda makes you wonder.
