|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,147
brace
|
|
brace
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,147 |
Quote:
The regionam system would seem to facilitate more practices. In past years sone teams were based in Greenville or Charleston giving some players long trips for practices. There should also be fewer club conflicts within each region. So, more practices and less travel would seem to be a positive. Whether one region is so lopsided with talent that its players who don't make the cut are better than those selected in the other regions remains to be seen, but I suspect that choosing 3 regional teams will result in more players included at each level. I've never counted. Does one region currently produce much more than a third of the players on the current teams?
So how will all this end up. Are we going to have three teams, one from each region and the top players from those three teams make the state team. Or do we just have region tryouts and each region is considerd a team and then the best players from each region makes the state team. Now i assume there are different coaches from each region so who has the final say in who makes it. sounds like to me all this is doing is giving a player that is not good eneough to make the team a better chance. someone said not to forget about the political aspect of this. seems it will be even more political now that you will have state region coaches with their own team picked from their own club team with the imput of their club parents. then u will have a watered down state team with good players being left off. sounds more political now and some power struggles that will go on within the regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|