I don't have the time to find the post but this in reference to the college coaches comment ...
Note: There are always exceptions to the rule, and certainly examples that will without a doubt prove the following wrong, but it should still be considered food for thought...
A college coach defined:
Play 4 years of college. Become a volunteer / grad assistant for 2-4 years. Be appointed a head coach of a small college. (Certainly prevalent in SC).
And this person is more qualified how?
Or alternatively, Mr. DI Head Coach deems it necessary that his assistant (who is a past player with 2-4 years of coaching experience) be annointed as an ODP Head Coach for recruiting purposes. Again, this is appropriate how?
As stated, just food for thought!
