This is an interesting piece.
First, regarding Chastain's comments, I would argue that the women's soccer developmental and career paths in this country are tangibly different from the men's; not to mention that her high school experience occurred some 20 years ago, in a much different place and time. Doesn't render her opinion invalid; just different. My guess is, had there been a Women's Academy back then, she would have been there, if forced to choose. If her son chooses to pursue soccer, we'll see what HIS choice will be in 8-10 years ... if no accommodation has been reached by that time.
---
Second, while Donovan recalls his high school experience positively, he seems to endorse the USSF approach. Which doesn't necessarily make it right, but seems to be a tad more relevant.
As I've said repeatedly, the correct answer is BOTH ... with coaches recognizing their counterparts' contribution to personal and athletic development.
***
I would point out one other irony. My son has been approached several times to try out as a kicker for his high school football team. When he expressed concern about potential conflicts with the fall Academy schedule, the FOOTBALL coaches hastened to point out that they'd do everything they could to minimize practice time and potential conflicts.
Imagine that. "Hard-headed" football coaches aggressively seeking an accommodation, while soccer programs and coaches can not.
