I agree whole-heartedly. I wish more coaches gave game summaries and stats with their score reporting. I enjoy reading them and yes it helps N/S and All-star committees make more informed decisions.
I will say this ... The more discussion on the message board about the quality of teams, players, regions, areas, etc. assists greatly in accurately forming the rankings. Also, teams that strive to upgrade their schedule by playing top teams in their area, via tourneys, or across the state help in validating their positions.
For example, too many times, we'll have a team at 14-1, but has played virtually no one of merit, while another team will be 9-6, but has played a very competitive schedule and tested themselves against top competition. This particular team has worked to market themselves for ranking consideration by playing tough opponents, rather than simply schedule for wins.
FWIW.
