If it is just two kids competing, why is one of the kids not even oriented at all towards the ball? Is it not the ball for which they ought to be competing?
I am suspecting that some of the people on this site never watch professional football and do not understand the Laws.
A friend sent me this from last year: two common elements. 1. the player who commits the foul leaves his feet to enhance the contact. 2. the player who commits the foul plays for Seneca. Differences? 1. the player for A.C. Flora is knocked unconscious. 2. the Seneca player is sent off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72yKxmhaDqs

Any of you who think the attack on Kit was just kids competing for the ball, please explain to me how this red card foul call is any different. Or would you say that the Seneca kid should not have received the red card last year?

If this kind of play is allowed to continue, our kids will eventually be required to wear gridiron-style football helmets.