Firefly,
You opened the door to the engineering student comment so I just couldn't help myself. Engineering graduates know that you have to state your assumptions. For your statement to be true, would require that the ROFL is proper on the trailing 180 of the prop. Conversely, ROFL could be proper on the leading 180 of the prop, therefore, would be LFOR on the trailing 180. So the simple statement of your assumption, of the ROFL being in the proper alignment on the trailing 180 would make your post correct. However, without it, it's not a correct statement.
