For me it's rather a question of which meeting? The rules meeting that I attended this spring was the same as one of the chosen representatives, we left at the same time and unless he doubled back for a secret covert meeting (sarcasm, don't jump on me) then clearly this was decided previously in which case I reiterate Bruticus's statement of the catch-22 problem. I'm not bitter about the selection and I believe everything will work out fairly, however I do want to know how to become part of the process as opposed to an outsider looking in. Both of the top programs in Region I have new coaches this year who couldn't have attended the meeting last year so there must have been some other way to select the representative. I personally think that maybe we need to alter the selection committees makeup (not for this year) to be either the winner of each region the current year or the previous year. This would help to clarify who goes and how to get invited. Furthermore the region champions reasonably have much at stake and I believe would be able to give a full report as to the other teams in the region. What are the methods for proposing changes to the current setup?
