SCPaver: I apologize, I was too terse. There are two things I'm trying to communicate with the above sentence. The first was the text itself: "In addition, perhaps it's time for high schools to think of other ways to gain a competitive advantage.", the second was a hyperlink giving an example. In Columbia, some high schools have short-sided teams that play at the Plex in the fall to get more work.
I wasn't trying to refute the argument you and others are making; it seems to me statistically that the league should force these schools to play at higher levels of play until one is found in which they're competitive but not dominating. But until the league does it, I was simply trying to point out alternatives for high schools, all high schools, to improve the overall quality of their programs.
Again, I apologize for the ambiguity.
