Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 19 of 24 1 2 17 18 19 20 21 23 24
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 547
S
Goal
Goal
S Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 547
I feel like I'm in court. This forum was a lot more fun when teenagers where smack talking each other.

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,170
S
coach
coach
S Offline
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,170
Soccer Watcher: Your comments have been recorded and will be used against you in future SCYSA proceedings. The charge: child endangerment by advocating our youth to verbally spar. [Smile]

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 184
P
goal kick
goal kick
P Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 184
New shoes on my ride!

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
HE's BACK!

Got my diamonds on the bottom, kid just like Ron T over at NECSA. That way they can't tell you are a gansta!

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 100
X
x Offline
goal kick
x
goal kick
X Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 100
BD,
You better be calling Jackie Childs.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 184
P
goal kick
goal kick
P Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 184
Eye Sore,
whatever man. no gansta here. i am a lover, not a fighter.

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I hear ya.

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,429
B
hat-trick
hat-trick
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,429
No joking....there is an angle on this whole thing in which I've been wrong.

Part of my distate had to do with the belief that right or wrong, CESA was violating the state 50% rule as it relates to districts. After Chico's challenges...I went back and read the by-laws and rules and the only reference I could find to the 50% rule in SCYSA by-laws says that an SCYSA team needs to have at least 50% SC residents.

There is nothing explicitly referencing the 50% rule appling to district residency, only state residency. The district residency is an interpretation specific to the CESA-COLA situation.

From this perspective this seems to me to be a pretty weak interpretation.

So I still believe in local consolidation....and strongly prefer it. I can name off a whole bunch of reasons why logically (at least to me) there are better options than this. And after about 72 posts I guess I already have.

But at the end of the day my gut tells me that CESA did nothing wrong, violated no rule and should have been allowed to proceed.

Yikes. Sorry all....but 1 of the first things I said was that rules are meant to maintain order and prevent chaos. If you don't violate a rule...





I still think consolidation should be done locally. But there are no SCYSA rules explicitly related to what was attempted. And the interpretation is a stretch. I didn't realize this.

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,659
world cup
world cup
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,659
53 posts on your first week on the boards. Big Daddy, you are the Rookie of the Year!

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
J
world cup
world cup
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,826
Actually.. I've enacted a "divider" to apply to posters like Chico, Big Daddy, lurker,etc.. They obviously have an advantage over the rest of us.. perhaps recruiting interns to do research..we can't really say. But the divider should keep the post differential reasonable.

Page 19 of 24 1 2 17 18 19 20 21 23 24

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0