"Holy cow. It's not the partnership clause that is in question -- that's what threw me. By the logic of their decision defining the inter-district 50% rule, to be consistent the SCYSA would have to deny rule 201 transfers to other states if they are going to play on teams consisting of 50% or more players from one SC district."
Hmm.....I don't know Chico. You could be right. But you release players to another state, right? Not a team. The team rostering process is independent of the player rostering process, right?
As I understand it, a kid playing out of state first registers in state, then is released to be registered in their playing state. We haven't hit a team yet. How does SCYSA know team makeup? Its been so long since I've seen the player registration paperwork, does it even reference a team?
