You raise great questions on how ambiguities are intepreted and resolved.
And you nailed my response to you dead on. Scenario A violated the 50% clause of SC. Scenario B was simply releasing players to play in another state, something that happens all the time.
The question here is....does SCYSA impose internal requirements on other states, if SC players are participating. My guess is no. Once released, that player becomes subject to the rules and restrictions of the host state. And if the host state doesn't have a 50% rule....
