>> [Rocket] By my reading, the organization is not the least bit dependent on ODP. In all 3 years shown, the ODP program ran at a deficit. Of course, what that means to the overall program depends on how some overhead costs are allocated.<<
You're right, ODP is positive from a revenue and cash flow perspective but not a profit perspective. Of course, you could say that about everything in the last three years; but your point is absolutely taken with respect to ODP.
>>Still, it looks as if you could kill the ODP program and the SCYSA budget would be better off. Not advocating that, you understand.<<
Unfortunately (or not, depending on your perspective), the USYSA would then find another group to become the SCYSA since that's part of the "cost of doing business."
>>It looks as if at the state level, as at most clubs, the elite player is subsidized by the rec player.<<
Huh? How did you get that from these numbers?
