I was a long time member of SSC but now I am a member of the Bridge in supporting my daughter's love of the game.
I attended many SSC meeting and fully understand why general membership does not attend.....Big waste of time. Why should a general membership have to go to a monthly meeting to know the issues and what is being done about them? Communications should be more than just the monthly meeting and with general membership not attending how in the world does general membership understand what they can do to help or be apart of the solution.
When SSC agreed to support the Bridge concept perception was that the SSC board voted and passed the agreement without general membership really knowing what happened. I truelly believe that now with new board members that they do not totally agree with the Bridge concept or have an ax to grind. What does general membership think or want for the future of SSC. General membership probably does not even know that the Bridge paid for the use of SSC fields......perception by general membership was that the Bridge teams were just taking over the SSC facilities.
If the Bridge concept is going to work we will need the support of SSC. Breaking ties with the Bridge is not going to be in the best interst of the players for either club.
