Okay...more seriously.
It's my understanding that Title IX enforces the concept of proportionality, i.e., that the proportion of the funding of the athletic department must reflect the proportion of genders at a university. The folks that want to reform Title IX want a different interpretation, to wit that proportionality may refer to the proportional interest in athletics by the genders that constitute the study body rather than the actual numbers.
In any case, I would think that the Citadel is vastly a male-oriented institution. Given the Title IX proportionality test, why would the Citadel need to be spending much on women's sports as per Title IX?
Or does this really have anything to do with Title IX but instead has to do with decisions that the Citadel administration has made for reasons that lie outside of Title IX?
