"No matter how good an individual team or player becomes at those clubs, it is ALWAYS better if, by U11 or U12, they have the chance to be with a higher quantity of higher quality."
Beezer, you obviously have an uneducated opinion in several areas. I do not have the time to waste going through each of your inaccurate statements of what you think is correct but will just point out one; the statement above, where did you learn that "it is always better for U11 or U12 players"? If you had any coaching education or training in sports/child psychology you would know that your above statement is not correct.
You need to be more careful on trying to educate people with what you think is correct and go with facts. Try attending a USYSA National Youth License and then come back and make your statments. Maybe then you could accurately bash DOC's and clubs about what's good player development. Maybe you would also understand a little clearer to why clubs are not jumping into relationship with the Bridge and jeopordizing player development. I think you will find everyone agrees to the concept of working together but have serious concerns to how bussiness is being conducted.
