So, the problem with pk's is that 5 players on each team alternate kicks? Is it more acceptable that a pk at the end of regulation decide the game? How is that more indicative of the "team"?
I notice that some (not all, by any means) Lex supporters are less than humble even when they win. This is not a reflection of their players or even their coaches I'm sure, but when every game that doesn't end in 5 or more goals is coined by "terribly officiated" or "resting starters" or "could have easily been 6 or 7 goals", it gets a bit tiresome.
Also to truefan regarding "fun"-do you really believe it's about fun? That would be rec soccer-remember when everybody made the team and everybody played a set amount of time and it wasn't about winning. Heck they didn't even keep score. Does Lex actually do that?
