Well said, Chico...and I am genuinely trying to understand just that. What's next cited "professionalism"--overall lack of credential requirements by the SCHSL--as the reason club officials of his acquaintance refused to participate in HS matches; I really don't want to think that translates into something more akin to "elitism." Fact is, we need as many good, responsible individuals--credentials notwithstanding--as we can get to work with our high school youth, to help maintain both the quality and the safety of the sport. If there are obstacles that make it less than desirable for qualified persons to participate, I'd like to see them brought to light so that they can hopefully be addressed.
On a related note, speaking of enjoying the role of officiating...we the coaches have been told by the HSL to maintain a strict distance from the officials, not to speak to or approach them after matches, not even to thank them for coming or compliment them on a job well done--when the final whistle blows everyone immediately goes their separate ways without so much as a how-do-you-do-good-match. I was wondering how this affects the perceived relationship between officials, coaches and players. I was always brought up to show hospitality, especially on my home field; to me, it seems distant and even rude to walk away without a word, and it also seems this rule assumes an adversarial relationship between officials and coaches. I wonder if it would be a more pleasant and enjoyable profession if we could have the option to exchange courtesy and make people feel welcome on our fields? I can't imagine really enjoying a job where I felt like I had to get out at all speed afterwards, avoiding eye contact with anyone around.
I'll admit I've bent the "no-approach" rule just far enough to say, "Gentlemen, thank you" to the officials while leaving the field. Any feedback on this issue from coaches and/or officials?
